124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35717685)
41. Use of radiomics based on
Zhou Y; Ma XL; Zhang T; Wang J; Zhang T; Tian R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Aug; 48(9):2904-2913. PubMed ID: 33547553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.
Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Zhang Z; Zangwill LM; Hao J; Lee TW; Sejnowski TJ; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1322-9. PubMed ID: 15790898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers.
Zangwill LM; Chan K; Bowd C; Hao J; Lee TW; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ; Goldbaum MH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3144-51. PubMed ID: 15326133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Different cell imaging methods did not significantly improve immune cell image classification performance.
Ogawa T; Ochiai K; Iwata T; Ikawa T; Tsuzuki T; Shiroguchi K; Takahashi K
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262397. PubMed ID: 35085287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Machine Learning of Patient Characteristics to Predict Admission Outcomes in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.
Amiri H; Kohane IS;
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2036220. PubMed ID: 33630084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.
Kunimatsu A; Kunimatsu N; Yasaka K; Akai H; Kamiya K; Watadani T; Mori H; Abe O
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29769456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ensemble learning with active example selection for imbalanced biomedical data classification.
Oh S; Lee MS; Zhang BT
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 20876935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.
Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; van Sloun RJG; Budäus L; Tilki D; Wijkstra H; Salomon G; Mischi M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):806-815. PubMed ID: 31602512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An efficient framework for automated screening of Clinically Significant Macular Edema.
Chalakkal R; Hafiz F; Abdulla W; Swain A
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Mar; 130():104128. PubMed ID: 33529843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Characterization of unusual MgCa particles involved in the formation of foraminifera shells using a novel quantitative cryo SEM/EDS protocol.
Mor Khalifa G; Kahil K; Erez J; Kaplan Ashiri I; Shimoni E; Pinkas I; Addadi L; Weiner S
Acta Biomater; 2018 Sep; 77():342-351. PubMed ID: 30026104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of machine learning methods with Fourier Transform features for classifying ovarian tumors based on ultrasound images.
Martínez-Más J; Bueno-Crespo A; Khazendar S; Remezal-Solano M; Martínez-Cendán JP; Jassim S; Du H; Al Assam H; Bourne T; Timmerman D
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219388. PubMed ID: 31348783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multiple classifier systems for automatic sleep scoring in mice.
Gao V; Turek F; Vitaterna M
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 May; 264():33-39. PubMed ID: 26928255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
Lee J; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Ha A; Kim YW; Park KH
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31848786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Review of some existing QML frameworks and novel hybrid classical-quantum neural networks realising binary classification for the noisy datasets.
Schetakis N; Aghamalyan D; Griffin P; Boguslavsky M
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11927. PubMed ID: 35831369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Classification of THz pulse signals using two-dimensional cross-correlation feature extraction and non-linear classifiers.
Siuly ; Yin X; Hadjiloucas S; Zhang Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():64-82. PubMed ID: 27000290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.
Weng WH; Wagholikar KB; McCray AT; Szolovits P; Chueh HC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 29191207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early detection of ankylosing spondylitis using texture features and statistical machine learning, and deep learning, with some patient age analysis.
Castro-Zunti R; Park EH; Choi Y; Jin GY; Ko SB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2020 Jun; 82():101718. PubMed ID: 32464565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Correlative electrochemical strain and scanning electron microscopy for local characterization of the solid state electrolyte Li
Schön N; Gunduz DC; Yu S; Tempel H; Schierholz R; Hausen F
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2018; 9():1564-1572. PubMed ID: 29977690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
