These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Extending boundaries in minimally invasive procedures with simultaneous bilateral video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (veil) for penile cancer: initial Denver health medical center and ABC school of medicine experience and surgical considerations. Pompeo A; Tobias-Machado M; Molina WR; Lucio J; Sehrt D; Pompeo AC; Kim FJ Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 24054388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique. Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients? Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): initial case report and comparison with open radical procedure. Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Molina WR; Zambon JP; Medina JA; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER Arch Esp Urol; 2006 Oct; 59(8):849-52. PubMed ID: 17153511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer. Patel AS; Isharwal S Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Carcinoma Penis. Rawal SK; Singh A; Khanna A J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(S2):S12-S17. PubMed ID: 36154450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma. Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results. Jacobellis U J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1349-52. PubMed ID: 12629358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes. Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 16813678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Patel KN; Salunke A; Bakshi G; Jayaprakash D; Pandya SJ Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e11-112.e22. PubMed ID: 34895995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer using a fascial-sparing surgical technique. Schifano N; Fallara G; Rezvani S; Pozzi E; Churchill J; Castiglione F; Rewhorn M; Hadway P; Nigam R; Rees R; Sangar V; Lau M; Parnham A; Alnajjar H; Muneer A World J Urol; 2023 Jun; 41(6):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 37019998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer. Yuan P; Zhao C; Liu Z; Ou Z; He W; Cai Y; Wang Y; Zu X; Qi L; Wang L J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 29256632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL)--a prospective critical perioperative assessment of feasibility and morbidity with points of technique in penile carcinoma. Pahwa HS; Misra S; Kumar A; Kumar V; Agarwal A; Srivastava R World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 11():42. PubMed ID: 23432959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Coblentz TR; Theodorescu D J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1386-9. PubMed ID: 12352399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Partial Penectomy With Bilateral Robotic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Using Near-infrared Fluorescence Guidance. Sávio LF; Panizzutti Barboza M; Alameddine M; Ahdoot M; Alonzo D; Ritch CR Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():251. PubMed ID: 29191642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saphenous-sparing laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Chiapparrone G; Rapisarda S; de Concilio B; Zeccolini G; Antoniutti M; Celia A Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):645-646. PubMed ID: 29064655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: An Indian Multicenter Experience. Rawal SK; Khanna A; Singh A; Jindal T; Sk R; Kumar B; Taori R; Pratihar SK; Vasudeo V; Saurabh N; Ali M; Malla I; Adhikari K J Endourol; 2024 Aug; 38(8):879-883. PubMed ID: 38661519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: surgical and oncological results. Romanelli P; Nishimoto R; Suarez R; Decia R; Abreu D; Machado M; Arroyo C; Campolo H; Campos E; Carlos AS; Tobias-Machado M Actas Urol Esp; 2013 May; 37(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 23433745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]