These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35719020)

  • 1. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
    Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
    Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models.
    Darroudi AM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ongkosuwito EM; Suttorp CM; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28457278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular anterior dental crowding in digital dental casts.
    Fernandes LQP; Nunes LKF; Alves LS; Ribeiro FAC; Capelli J
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):64-71. PubMed ID: 28746489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients.
    Jiménez-Gayosso SI; Lara-Carrillo E; López-González S; Medina-Solís CE; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Hernández-Martínez CT; Colomé-Ruiz GE; Escoffié-Ramirez M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(22):e10887. PubMed ID: 29851810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - A retrospective clinical study.
    Lippold C; Kirschneck C; Schreiber K; Abukiress S; Tahvildari A; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():103-9. PubMed ID: 25917690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
    Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency and Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Models Versus Dental Casts: A Clinical Study.
    Yılmaz H; Özlü FÇ; Karadeniz C; Karadeniz Eİ
    Turk J Orthod; 2019 Dec; 32(4):214-218. PubMed ID: 32110466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Adobes Martin M; Lipani E; Bernes Martinez L; Alvarado Lorenzo A; Aiuto R; Garcovich D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35329271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts.
    Fu X; Peng C; Li Z; Liu S; Tan M; Song J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178858. PubMed ID: 28640827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
    Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between stone and digital cast measurements in mixed dentition : Validity, reliability, reproducibility, and objectivity.
    Schieffer L; Latzko L; Ulmer H; Schenz-Spisic N; Lepperdinger U; Paulus M; Crismani AG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):75-84. PubMed ID: 35238945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.