These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35719135)

  • 1. Implementing a preimplantation proteomic approach to advance assisted reproduction technologies in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.
    Kanaka V; Proikakis S; Drakakis P; Loutradis D; Tsangaris GT
    EPMA J; 2022 Jun; 13(2):237-260. PubMed ID: 35719135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.
    Chambers GM; Dyer S; Zegers-Hochschild F; de Mouzon J; Ishihara O; Banker M; Mansour R; Kupka MS; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2921-2934. PubMed ID: 34601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteomics in Human Reproduction.
    De Rose MB; Piccolomini MM; Soares Belo AS; Borges E; Filho FF
    Protein Pept Lett; 2018; 25(5):420-423. PubMed ID: 29651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012†.
    de Mouzon J; Chambers GM; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Banker M; Dyer S; Kupka M; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1900-1913. PubMed ID: 32699900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker.
    Azkargorta M; Escobes I; Iloro I; Osinalde N; Corral B; Ibañez-Perez J; Exposito A; Prieto B; Elortza F; Matorras R
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1898-1906. PubMed ID: 30169642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Use of Proteomics in Assisted Reproduction.
    Kosteria I; Anagnostopoulos AK; Kanaka-Gantenbein C; Chrousos GP; Tsangaris GT
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):267-283. PubMed ID: 28438852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
    Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of hyaluronan-enriched culture medium and intrauterine infusion of human chorionic gonadotropin on clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer cycles.
    Balakier H; Kuznyetsova I; Librach CL
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Apr; 66(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 32129683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making IVF more effective through the evolution of prediction models: is prognosis the missing piece of the puzzle?
    Simopoulou M; Sfakianoudis K; Antoniou N; Maziotis E; Rapani A; Bakas P; Anifandis G; Kalampokas T; Bolaris S; Pantou A; Pantos K; Koutsilieris M
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2018 Oct; 64(5):305-323. PubMed ID: 30088950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endometrial Receptivity Analysis - a tool to increase an implantation rate in assisted reproduction.
    Hromadová L; Tokareva I; Veselá K; Trávník P; Veselý J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 31324106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes-The Value of Regulatory Frameworks.
    Medenica S; Zivanovic D; Batkoska L; Marinelli S; Basile G; Perino A; Cucinella G; Gullo G; Zaami S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36552986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mucosal biomarkers for endometrial receptivity: A promising yet underexplored aspect of reproductive medicine.
    Jain M; Samokhodskaya L; Mladova E; Panina O
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2022 Feb; 68(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 34632899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.
    Siristatidis CS; Sertedaki E; Vaidakis D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011872. PubMed ID: 28534597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) history and clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.
    Cai X; Zhang M; Huang C; Jiang Y; Zhou J; Xu M; Yan G; Sun H; Kong N
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):27. PubMed ID: 35120557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the development of assisted reproductive technology in Liaoning province of China, from 2012 to 2016.
    Fang YY; Wu QJ; Zhang TN; Wang TR; Shen ZQ; Jiao J; Shao XG; Xu P; Guo SS; Zhou YM; Wang XX; Li D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Nov; 18(1):873. PubMed ID: 30458780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
    Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
    JOINT SOGC-CFAS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.