These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35719580)

  • 41. The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers' purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior.
    Hahnel UJ; Arnold O; Waschto M; Korcaj L; Hillmann K; Roser D; Spada H
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1392. PubMed ID: 26441767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just
    Vis B; Dul J
    Sociol Methods Res; 2018 Nov; 47(4):872-899. PubMed ID: 30443090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Understanding older adults' medication decision making and behavior: A study on over-the-counter (OTC) anticholinergic medications.
    Holden RJ; Srinivas P; Campbell NL; Clark DO; Bodke KS; Hong Y; Boustani MA; Ferguson D; Callahan CM;
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2019 Jan; 15(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 29559218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How active and passive social media use affects impulse buying in Chinese college students? The roles of emotional responses, gender, materialism and self-control.
    Chen S; Zhi K; Chen Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1011337. PubMed ID: 36248456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Australian Consumers' Preferences for Food Attributes: A Latent Profile Analysis.
    Zhang A; Jakku E
    Foods; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33379280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: A neuromarketing study.
    Golnar-Nik P; Farashi S; Safari MS
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Aug; 207():90-98. PubMed ID: 31047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of nutrition-focused mobile apps' influence on consumers' healthy food behaviour and nutrition knowledge.
    Samoggia A; Riedel B
    Food Res Int; 2020 Feb; 128():108766. PubMed ID: 31955740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Consumers' and providers' perspectives about consumer participation in drug treatment services: is there support to do more? What are the obstacles?
    Bryant J; Saxton M; Madden A; Bath N; Robinson S
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2008 Mar; 27(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 18264873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Study protocol: developing a decision system for inclusive housing: applying a systematic, mixed-method quasi-experimental design.
    Zeeman H; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Wright CJ; Townsend C; Smith D; Lakhani A; Kennerley S
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Mar; 16():261. PubMed ID: 26975348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of food delivery applications on Romanian consumers' behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Burlea-Schiopoiu A; Puiu S; Dinu A
    Socioecon Plann Sci; 2022 Aug; 82():101220. PubMed ID: 35013625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The experience of psychosis and recovery from consumers' perspectives: An integrative literature review.
    Alyahya NM; Munro I; Moss C
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2022 Feb; 29(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 33031615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Corporate crisis management on social media: A morality violations perspective.
    Zheng B; Bi G; Liu H; Lowry PB
    Heliyon; 2020 Jul; 6(7):e04435. PubMed ID: 32715127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Drivers of high-involvement consumers' intention to buy PDO wines: Valpolicella PDO case study.
    Capitello R; Agnoli L; Begalli D
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3407-17. PubMed ID: 26538481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Consumers' perspectives on their involvement in recognizing and responding to patient deterioration-Developing a model for consumer reporting.
    King L; Peacock G; Crotty M; Clark R
    Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 30588720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Consumer Contextual Decision-Making Model.
    Suomala J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570430. PubMed ID: 33117237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior.
    Qi X; Ploeger A
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():414-422. PubMed ID: 30537527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is Green Spread? The Spillover Effect of Community Green Interaction on Related Green Purchase Behavior.
    Wang J; Yang X; Xi Y; He Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Beyond regression: Unpacking research of human complex systems with qualitative comparative analysis.
    Xu X; Tahir SH; Khan KB; Sajid MA; Safdar MA
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31457. PubMed ID: 38813179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring the Relationship Between Social Commerce Features and Consumers' Repurchase Intentions: The Mediating Role of Perceived Value.
    Guo J; Li L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():775056. PubMed ID: 35401287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Shared decision-making in serious mental illness: A comparative study.
    Huang C; Plummer V; Lam L; Cross W
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Aug; 103(8):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 32201171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.