These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35719818)

  • 1. Screw Insertion Time, Fluoroscopy Time, and Operation Time for Robotic-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Compared With Freehand Technique.
    Torii Y; Ueno J; Umehara T; Iinuma M; Yoshida A; Tomochika K; Niki H; Akazawa T
    Cureus; 2022 May; 14(5):e25039. PubMed ID: 35719818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement During Spine Surgery.
    Lieberman IH; Kisinde S; Hesselbacher S
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2020; 10(2):e0020. PubMed ID: 32944411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
    Molliqaj G; Schatlo B; Alaid A; Solomiichuk V; Rohde V; Schaller K; Tessitore E
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E14. PubMed ID: 28463623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Aurouer N; Guerin P; Cogniet A; Gangnet N; Pedram M; Piechaud PT; ; Mangione P
    Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):106. PubMed ID: 38310274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and Screw Insertion Time of Robotic-Assisted Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Early, Middle, and Late Phases.
    Ueno J; Akazawa T; Torii Y; Umehara T; Iinuma M; Yoshida A; Tomochika K; Niki H
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32574. PubMed ID: 36654567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery.
    Zhang JN; Fan Y; He X; Liu TJ; Hao DJ
    Int Orthop; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1531-1538. PubMed ID: 32989559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Lumbar Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation in Patients with Osteoporosis.
    Feng S; Tian W; Sun Y; Liu Y; Wei Y
    World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e1057-e1062. PubMed ID: 30790729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.
    Solomiichuk V; Fleischhammer J; Molliqaj G; Warda J; Alaid A; von Eckardstein K; Schaller K; Tessitore E; Rohde V; Schatlo B
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E13. PubMed ID: 28463620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Naik A; Smith AD; Shaffer A; Krist DT; Moawad CM; MacInnis BR; Teal K; Hassaneen W; Arnold PM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E10. PubMed ID: 34973681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison.
    Schatlo B; Molliqaj G; Cuvinciuc V; Kotowski M; Schaller K; Tessitore E
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 24725180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Peng YN; Tsai LC; Hsu HC; Kao CH
    Ann Transl Med; 2020 Jul; 8(13):824. PubMed ID: 32793669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.
    Lee NJ; Zuckerman SL; Buchanan IA; Boddapati V; Mathew J; Leung E; Park PJ; Pham MH; Buchholz AL; Khan A; Pollina J; Mullin JP; Jazini E; Haines C; Schuler TC; Good CR; Lombardi JM; Lehman RA
    Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1504-1512. PubMed ID: 34022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning curves for robotic-assisted spine surgery: an analysis of the time taken for screw insertion, robot setting, registration, and fluoroscopy.
    Akazawa T; Torii Y; Ueno J; Umehara T; Iinuma M; Yoshida A; Tomochika K; Ohtori S; Niki H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 37358731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Effects of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion by Conventional Open versus Percutaneous Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement in Elderly Patients.
    Feng S; Tian W; Wei Y
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 31880084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery From Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-analysis.
    Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jan; 45(2):E111-E119. PubMed ID: 31404053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw placement in scoliosis surgery: a comparison of robotic-navigation, O-arm-based navigation, and freehand techniques.
    Li C; Wang Z; Li D; Tian Y; Yuan S; Wang L; Liu X
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 37273031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.
    Kim HJ; Kang KT; Park SC; Kwon OH; Son J; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS; Lenke LG
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):671-680. PubMed ID: 27867080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching.
    Asada T; Simon CZ; Lu AZ; Adida S; Dupont M; Parel PM; Zhang J; Bhargava S; Morse KW; Dowdell JE; Iyer S; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2024 Jan; 24(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 37704046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT-to-fluoroscopy registration versus scan-and-plan registration for robot-assisted insertion of lumbar pedicle screws.
    Khan A; Soliman MAR; Lee NJ; Waqas M; Lombardi JM; Boddapati V; Levy LC; Mao JZ; Park PJ; Mathew J; Lehman RA; Mullin JP; Pollina J
    Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E8. PubMed ID: 34973678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Gao S; Lv Z; Fang H
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Apr; 27(4):921-930. PubMed ID: 29032475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.