113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35720751)
21. The organization of colposcopy services in Ontario: recommended framework.
Murphy J; Varela NP; Elit L; Lytwyn A; Yudin M; Shier M; Wu V; El-Khatib S
Curr Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 26300667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acceptability and implementation challenges of smartphone-based training of community health nurses for visual inspection with acetic acid in Ghana: mHealth and cervical cancer screening.
Asgary R; Cole H; Adongo P; Nwameme A; Maya E; Adu-Amankwah A; Barnett H; Adanu R
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030528. PubMed ID: 31315879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Telemedical cervical cancer screening to bridge medicaid service care gap for rural women.
Hitt WC; Low G; Bird TM; Ott R
Telemed J E Health; 2013 May; 19(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 23600410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 'Smartscopy' as an alternative device for cervical cancer screening: a pilot study.
Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Okazawa A; Kakuda M; Matsuzaki S; Kobayashi E; Yoshino K; Kimura T
BMJ Innov; 2017 Apr; 3(2):123-126. PubMed ID: 28794895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring colposcopy quality in Canada: development of population-based indicators.
Decker K; Baines N; Muzyka C; Lee M; Mayrand MH; Yang H; Fung S; Mercer D; McFaul S; Kupets R; Savoie R; Lotocki R; Bentley J
Curr Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):e286-e291. PubMed ID: 31285670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Colposcopy screening for cervical cancer in a family planning program.
Torres JE
J Reprod Med; 1976 May; 16(5):246-8. PubMed ID: 933103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings: a smartphone image application as an alternative to colposcopy.
Gallay C; Girardet A; Viviano M; Catarino R; Benski AC; Tran PL; Ecabert C; Thiran JP; Vassilakos P; Petignat P
Int J Womens Health; 2017; 9():455-461. PubMed ID: 28790867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using implementation facilitation to implement primary care mental health integration via clinical video telehealth in rural clinics: protocol for a hybrid type 2 cluster randomized stepped-wedge design.
Owen RR; Woodward EN; Drummond KL; Deen TL; Oliver KA; Petersen NJ; Meit SS; Fortney JC; Kirchner JE
Implement Sci; 2019 Mar; 14(1):33. PubMed ID: 30898129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nicaragua.
United States. Department of State. Bureau of Public Affairs
Backgr Notes Ser; 1983 Jan; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 12178081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Access to colposcopy services for high-risk Canadian women: can we do better?
Ogilvie GS; Shaw EA; Lusk SP; Zazulak J; Kaczorowski JA
Can J Public Health; 2004; 95(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 15490923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Design and implementation of a mobile health electronic data capture platform that functions in fully-disconnected settings: a pilot study in rural Liberia.
Kenny A; Gordon N; Downey J; Eddins O; Buchholz K; Menyon A; Mansah W
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Feb; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 32087731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical cancer prevention in remote rural Nicaragua: a program evaluation.
Howe SL; Vargas DE; Granada D; Smith JK
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S232-5. PubMed ID: 16198400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating smartphone strategies for reliability, reproducibility, and quality of VIA for cervical cancer screening in the Shiselweni region of Eswatini: A cohort study.
Asgary R; Staderini N; Mthethwa-Hleta S; Lopez Saavedra PA; Garcia Abrego L; Rusch B; Marie Luce T; Rusike Pasipamire L; Ndlangamandla M; Beideck E; Kerschberger B
PLoS Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):e1003378. PubMed ID: 33211691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of a Telecolposcopy Program in Rural Settings.
Hitt WC; Low GM; Lynch CE; Gauss CH; Magann EF; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Oct; 22(10):816-820. PubMed ID: 27128600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of telehealth services to facilitate audiological management for children: A scoping review and content analysis.
Govender SM; Mars M
J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Apr; 23(3):392-401. PubMed ID: 27130158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing Mobile Phone Access and Perceptions for Texting-Based mHealth Interventions Among Expectant Mothers and Child Caregivers in Remote Regions of Northern Kenya: A Survey-Based Descriptive Study.
Kazi AM; Carmichael JL; Hapanna GW; Wangoo PG; Karanja S; Wanyama D; Muhula SO; Kyomuhangi LB; Loolpapit M; Wangalwa GB; Kinagwi K; Lester RT
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2017 Jan; 3(1):e5. PubMed ID: 28137702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth platform for delivering the Making Sense of Brain Tumour programme: A mixed-methods pilot study.
Ownsworth T; Cubis L; Prasad T; Foote M; Kendall M; Oram J; Chambers S; Pinkham MB
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 32(3):378-406. PubMed ID: 33000690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The suitability of digital colposcopy for telematic applications].
Schädell D; Coumbos A; Ey S; Willrodt RG; Kühn W; Albrecht H
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):157-62. PubMed ID: 15279465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
