157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35721236)
1. Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gu H; Cui W; Luo S; Deng X
Appl Bionics Biomech; 2022; 2022():2042736. PubMed ID: 35721236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Characterization of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.
Li Z; Li X; Peng C; Dai W; Huang H; Li X; Xie C; Liang J
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():575272. PubMed ID: 33194685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The outstanding diagnostic value of DKI in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for benign and malignant breast tumors: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Zhang H; Li X; Han L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(40):e35337. PubMed ID: 37800758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of mono-exponential DWI versus diffusion kurtosis imaging in breast lesions: A meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Jin Y; Li M; Zhang J; Wang S; Zhang H; Song B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(44):e31574. PubMed ID: 36343063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Head and Neck Lesions.
Cheng J; Shao S; Chen W; Zheng N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):414-423. PubMed ID: 34378259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of breast tumors using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI).
Wu D; Li G; Zhang J; Chang S; Hu J; Dai Y
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113240. PubMed ID: 25406010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Diffusion Weighted Imaging Techniques for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
He M; Ruan H; Ma M; Zhang Z
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():694634. PubMed ID: 34235084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prediction of prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer.
Wang W; Lv S; Xun J; Wang L; Zhao F; Wang J; Zhou Z; Chen Y; Sun Z; Zhu L
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110392. PubMed ID: 35679701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. XGboost Prediction Model Based on 3.0T Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI BiRADS 4 Masses.
Tang W; Zhou H; Quan T; Chen X; Zhang H; Lin Y; Wu R
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():833680. PubMed ID: 35372060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions in Diffusion Kurtosis MRI: Does the Averaging Procedure Matter?
Pistel M; Laun FB; Bickelhaupt S; Dada A; Weiland E; Niederdränk T; Uder M; Janka R; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 56(5):1343-1352. PubMed ID: 35289015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?
Ding Y; Tan Q; Mao W; Dai C; Hu X; Hou J; Zeng M; Zhou J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6930-6939. PubMed ID: 31161315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of breast lesions using diffusion kurtosis model-based imaging: An initial experience.
Zhou WP; Zan XY; Hu XY; Liu X; Sudarshan SKP; Yang SD; Guo YJ; Fang XM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):157-169. PubMed ID: 31815728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative kurtosis value and diffusion coefficient.
Shen L; Zhou G; Tang F; Lin Y; Zhou J; Lv P; Wang Y; Zong G; Zhao J
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():44-56. PubMed ID: 29908349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
Xu F; Liang YY; Guo Y; Liang ZP; Wu M; Chen S; Zeng XW
Acta Radiol; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 31924104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nalaini F; Shahbazi F; Mousavinezhad SM; Ansari A; Salehi M
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210059. PubMed ID: 34111960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging parameters in breast lesions: Effect of radiologists' experience and region-of-interest selection.
Si L; Liu X; Li X; Yang K; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110633. PubMed ID: 36470051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.
Liu W; Wei C; Bai J; Gao X; Zhou L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant and benign soft-tissue masses: which is better?
Liu Y; Yin Z; Li X; Zhang Y; Yuan Y; Wei L; Wang S
Acta Radiol; 2022 Jun; 63(6):785-793. PubMed ID: 34000824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
