143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35721454)
81. Melanoma in the Blink of an Eye: Pathologists' Rapid Detection, Classification, and Localization of Skin Abnormalities.
Brunyé TT; Drew T; Saikia MJ; Kerr KF; Eguchi MM; Lee AC; May C; Elder DE; Elmore JG
Vis cogn; 2021; 29(6):386-400. PubMed ID: 35197796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times.
van Geel K; Kok EM; Krol JP; Houben IPL; Thibault FE; Pijnappel RM; van Merriënboer JJG; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():62-68. PubMed ID: 31307654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Effect of radiologists' experience with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm on detection of hypervascular liver lesions and perception of image quality.
Marin D; Mileto A; Gupta RT; Ho LM; Allen BC; Choudhury KR; Nelson RC
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2850-60. PubMed ID: 25783958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. 3D printing of anatomically realistic phantoms with detection tasks to assess the diagnostic performance of CT images.
Ardila Pardo GL; Conzelmann J; Genske U; Hamm B; Scheel M; Jahnke P
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4557-4563. PubMed ID: 32221686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. High-Resolution Chest Computed Tomography Imaging of the Lungs: Impact of 1024 Matrix Reconstruction and Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography.
Bartlett DJ; Koo CW; Bartholmai BJ; Rajendran K; Weaver JM; Halaweish AF; Leng S; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG
Invest Radiol; 2019 Mar; 54(3):129-137. PubMed ID: 30461437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Design and development of an ethnically-diverse imaging informatics-based eFolder system for multiple sclerosis patients.
Ma KC; Fernandez JR; Amezcua L; Lerner A; Shiroishi MS; Liu BJ
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2(Pt 2):257-68. PubMed ID: 26564667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task.
Bott NT; Lange A; Rentz D; Buffalo E; Clopton P; Zola S
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():370. PubMed ID: 28701915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
89. Eye tracking in digital pathology: A comprehensive literature review.
Lopes A; Ward AD; Cecchini M
J Pathol Inform; 2024 Dec; 15():100383. PubMed ID: 38868488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. A comparison of visual identification of dental radiographic and nonradiographic images using eye tracking technology.
Botelho MG; Ekambaram M; Bhuyan SY; Yeung AWK; Tanaka R; Bornstein MM; Li KY
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Feb; 6(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 32067393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Oral presentation assessment and image reading behaviour on brain computed tomography reading in novice clinical learners: an eye-tracking study.
Liu CH; Hung J; Chang CW; Lin JJH; Huang ES; Wang SL; Lee LA; Hsiao CT; Sung PS; Chao YP; Chang YJ
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Oct; 22(1):738. PubMed ID: 36284299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Tracking of a bronchoscope using epipolar geometry analysis and intensity-based image registration of real and virtual endoscopic images.
Mori K; Deguchi D; Sugiyama J; Suenaga Y; Toriwaki J; Maurer CR; Takabatake H; Natori H
Med Image Anal; 2002 Sep; 6(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 12270236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Minimum perceivable size difference: how well can radiologists visually detect a change in lung nodule size from CT images?
Solomon J; Ebner L; Christe A; Peters A; Munz J; Löbelenz L; Klaus J; Richards T; Samei E; Roos JE
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32997175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Deja Vu: semantics-aware recording and replay of high-speed eye tracking and interaction data to support cognitive studies of software engineering tasks-methodology and analyses.
Zyrianov V; Peterson CS; Guarnera DT; Behler J; Weston P; Sharif B; Maletic JI
Empir Softw Eng; 2022; 27(7):168. PubMed ID: 36159896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Distraction in diagnostic radiology: How is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions?
Williams LH; Drew T
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):12. PubMed ID: 28275705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Accuracy of semi-automated versus manual localisation of liver tumours in CT-guided ablation procedures.
Boulkhrif H; Luu HM; van Walsum T; Moelker A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):4978-4984. PubMed ID: 29802572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Comparative study of computational visual attention models on two-dimensional medical images.
Wen G; Rodriguez-Niño B; Pecen FY; Vining DJ; Garg N; Markey MK
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Apr; 4(2):025503. PubMed ID: 28523282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Eye-tracking differences between free text and template radiology reports: a pilot study.
Harris D; Yousem DM; Krupinski EA; Motaghi M
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11902. PubMed ID: 36761037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. A dataset of eye gaze images for calibration-free eye tracking augmented reality headset.
Yan Z; Wu Y; Shan Y; Chen W; Li X
Sci Data; 2022 Mar; 9(1):115. PubMed ID: 35351904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Attention and Information Acquisition: Comparison of Mouse-Click with Eye-Movement Attention Tracking.
Egner S; Reimann S; Hoeger R; Zangemeister WH
J Eye Mov Res; 2018 Nov; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33828714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
