These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35723655)

  • 1. Cranial base measurements in different anteroposterior skeletal relationships using Bjork-Jarabak analysis.
    Al Maaitah EF; Alomari S; Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jun; 92(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 35723655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel prediction models for pharyngeal-airway volume based on the cranial-base and midsagittal cross-sectional area of the airway in the pharyngeal region: A cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Habumugisha J; Nakamura M; Kono K; Uchida K; Konko M; Izawa T; Kamioka H
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jun; 27(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 38059557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cranial Base Measurements in Skeletal Malocclusion among Orthodontic Patients.
    Pant BD; Rajbhandari A; Pradhan R; Bajracharya M; Maharjan S
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2024 Mar; 21(3):486-490. PubMed ID: 38615222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.
    Monirifard M; Sadeghian S; Afshari Z; Rafiei E; Sichani AV
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 32055295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal open bite cranial base characteristics in young Latin-American individuals with class I, II and III malocclusions: An observational study.
    Flores-Ysla A; Arriola-Guillén LE; Rodríguez-Càrdenas YA; Ruíz-Mora GA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 32037207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of skeletal variations and establishment of Cephalometric Norms in Saudi Sub Population using Bjork Jarabak's analysis.
    Alshahrani I; Kamran MA; Alhaizaey A; Abumelha N
    Pak J Med Sci; 2018; 34(5):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 30344558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cranial base parameters in adults with skeletal class I and class II skeletal pattern.
    Dileep S; Khader MA; Ali H; Paul K D; Narayan M; Jayan A
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():41. PubMed ID: 36188206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric measurments of a Pakistani adult sample according to Jarabak's analysis.
    Khan T; Ahmed I; Gul-e-Erum
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2013 Nov; 63(11):1345-8. PubMed ID: 24392516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial morphology in patients with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    Bratu DC; Bălan RA; Szuhanek CA; Pop SI; Bratu EA; Popa G
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3):909-13. PubMed ID: 25329119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population.
    Chin A; Perry S; Liao C; Yang Y
    Head Face Med; 2014 Aug; 10():31. PubMed ID: 25129070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.
    Wilhelm BM; Beck FM; Lidral AC; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 11298313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateral cephalometric characteristics in individuals with Down Syndrome compared to non-syndromic controls: A meta-analysis.
    Bierley K; Antonarakis GS
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 124(4):101407. PubMed ID: 36738889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relation of cranial base flexure to cranial form and mandibular position.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 Jun; 61(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 6881319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.