These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35724290)

  • 1. A Patchwork Method to Improve the Performance of Current Methods for Solving the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography.
    Bouhamama O; Potse M; Bear L; Weynans L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 70(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 35724290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of the method of fundamental solutions to potential-based inverse electrocardiography.
    Wang Y; Rudy Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 34(8):1272-88. PubMed ID: 16807788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico validation of electrocardiographic imaging to reconstruct the endocardial and epicardial repolarization pattern using the equivalent dipole layer source model.
    van der Waal J; Meijborg V; Schuler S; Coronel R; Oostendorp T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Aug; 58(8):1739-1749. PubMed ID: 32474796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Accurate Is Inverse Electrocardiographic Mapping? A Systematic In Vivo Evaluation.
    Bear LR; LeGrice IJ; Sands GB; Lever NA; Loiselle DS; Paterson DJ; Cheng LK; Smaill BH
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 11(5):e006108. PubMed ID: 29700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI): comparison to intraoperative mapping in patients.
    Ghanem RN; Jia P; Ramanathan C; Ryu K; Markowitz A; Rudy Y
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Apr; 2(4):339-54. PubMed ID: 15851333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Vivo Validation of Electrocardiographic Imaging.
    Cluitmans MJM; Bonizzi P; Karel JMH; Das M; Kietselaer BLJH; de Jong MMJ; Prinzen FW; Peeters RLM; Westra RL; Volders PGA
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Mar; 3(3):232-242. PubMed ID: 29759517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiographic imaging: II. Effect of torso inhomogeneities on noninvasive reconstruction of epicardial potentials, electrograms, and isochrones.
    Ramanathan C; Rudy Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 12(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 11232625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac electrical dyssynchrony is accurately detected by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.
    Bear LR; Huntjens PR; Walton RD; Bernus O; Coronel R; Dubois R
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 29477975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meshless methods in potential inverse electrocardiography.
    Wang Y; Rudy Y
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2558-9. PubMed ID: 17946965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages and pitfalls of noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.
    Bear LR; Bouhamama O; Cluitmans M; Duchateau J; Walton RD; Abell E; Belterman C; Haissaguerre M; Bernus O; Coronel R; Dubois R
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 57S():S15-S20. PubMed ID: 31477238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconstruction of cardiac position using body surface potentials.
    Bergquist JA; Coll-Font J; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Good WW; Brooks DH; MacLeod RS
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Mar; 142():105174. PubMed ID: 35065409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of quadratic versus linear interpolation in noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI).
    Ghosh S; Rudy Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 33(9):1187-201. PubMed ID: 16133926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The electrocardiographic forward problem: A benchmark study.
    Bergquist JA; Good WW; Zenger B; Tate JD; Rupp LC; MacLeod RS
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104476. PubMed ID: 34051453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrocardiographic imaging in the atria.
    Hernández-Romero I; Molero R; Fambuena-Santos C; Herrero-Martín C; Climent AM; Guillem MS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Apr; 61(4):879-896. PubMed ID: 36370321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An expert review of the inverse problem in electrocardiographic imaging for the non-invasive identification of atrial fibrillation drivers.
    Yadan Z; Jian L; Jian W; Yifu L; Haiying L; Hairui L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107676. PubMed ID: 37343376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activation patterns during selective pacing of the left ventricle can be characterized using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.
    Shannon HJ; Navarro CO; Smith BA; McClelland AJ; Lau EW; Roberts MJ; Anderson JM; Adgey JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S111-7. PubMed ID: 17993307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation into the importance of using natural PVCs and pathological models for potential-based ECGI validation.
    Bear LR; Bergquist JA; Abell E; Cochet H; MacLeod RS; Dubois R; Serinagaoglu Y
    Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1198002. PubMed ID: 37275229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid 12-lead automated localization method: Comparison to electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) in patient-specific geometry.
    Zhou S; Horáček BM; Warren JW; AbdelWahab A; Sapp JL
    J Electrocardiol; 2018; 51(6S):S92-S97. PubMed ID: 30177365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of intramural necrotic regions using electrocardiographic imaging.
    Hren R
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():140-9. PubMed ID: 10688317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical Imaging of Ventricular Action Potentials in a Torso Tank: A New Platform for Non-Invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging Validation.
    Bear LR; Walton RD; Abell E; Coudière Y; Haissaguerre M; Bernus O; Dubois R
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():146. PubMed ID: 30863318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.