BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35724430)

  • 1. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
    World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study.
    Kuriyama K; Okamura A; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Sakamoto K; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    World J Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 37432423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
    Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
    Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Babic B; Schiffmann LM; Fuchs HF; Mueller DT; Schmidt T; Mallmann C; Mielke L; Frebel A; Schiller P; Bludau M; Chon SH; Schroeder W; Bruns CJ
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6777-6783. PubMed ID: 34981236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomic patterns of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: Impact on management and outcomes.
    Laydi M; Doussot A; Lakkis Z; Mathieu P; Gandon A; Dubois C; Degisors S; Martin L; Heyd B; Piessen G
    Surgery; 2023 Aug; 174(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 37270298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Plum PS; Herbold T; Berlth F; Christ H; Alakus H; Bludau M; Chang DH; Bruns CJ; Hölscher AH; Chon SH
    World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):862-869. PubMed ID: 30377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
    Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
    Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fashioning esophagogastric anastomosis in robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a multicenter experience.
    Milone M; Bianchi PP; Cianchi F; Coratti A; D'Amore A; De Manzoni G; De Pasqual CA; Formisano G; Jovine E; Morelli L; Offi M; Peri A; Pietrabissa A; Staderini F; Tribuzi A; Giacopuzzi S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Mar; 409(1):103. PubMed ID: 38517543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Omental Flap Wrapping Around the Esophagogastric Anastomosis and Association with Anastomotic Leak in Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.
    Yoshida N; Eto K; Matsumoto T; Kosumi K; Imamura Y; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):189-197. PubMed ID: 36205406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.