These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35725439)

  • 1. The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
    de Londras F; Cleeve A; Rodriguez MI; Farrell A; Furgalska M; Lavelanet A
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):1232. PubMed ID: 35725439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of provider restrictions on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
    de Londras F; Cleeve A; Rodriguez MI; Farrell A; Furgalska M; Lavelanet AF
    Reprod Health; 2022 Apr; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 35436888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of criminalisation on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
    de Londras F; Cleeve A; Rodriguez MI; Farrell A; Furgalska M; Lavelanet A
    BMJ Glob Health; 2022 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 36581332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive awareness and recognition of unintended pregnancy: young women, key informants and health care providers perspectives in South Africa.
    Somefun OD; Harries J; Constant D
    Reprod Health; 2021 Oct; 18(1):211. PubMed ID: 34702283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods: Survey Evidence before Arizona's Two-visit 24-hour Mandatory Waiting Period Law.
    Karasek D; Roberts SC; Weitz TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 26626710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): a realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law.
    Burris S; Ghorashi AR; Cloud LF; Rebouché R; Skuster P; Lavelanet A
    BMJ Glob Health; 2021 Jun; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 34117010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.
    Garnsey C; Zanini G; De Zordo S; Mishtal J; Wollum A; Gerdts C
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 34022888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion.
    Lindo JM; Pineda-Torres M
    J Health Econ; 2021 Dec; 80():102533. PubMed ID: 34607119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal barriers to access abortion services through a human rights lens: the Uruguayan experience.
    Berro Pizzarossa L
    Reprod Health Matters; 2018 Dec; 26(52):1422664. PubMed ID: 29338662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of 'grounds' on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
    de Londras F; Cleeve A; Rodriguez MI; Lavelanet AF
    BMC Public Health; 2022 May; 22(1):936. PubMed ID: 35538457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting International Humanitarian Law to Guarantee Abortion and Other Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Armed Conflict.
    Zampas C; Brown R; Afulukwe O
    Health Hum Rights; 2024 Jun; 26(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 38933223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.
    de Londras F; Cleeve A; Rodriguez MI; Farrell A; Furgalska M; Lavelanet AF
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):2065. PubMed ID: 37872513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The hyper-regulation of abortion care in Italy.
    Caruso E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Dec; 163(3):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 37724041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
    Sollom T
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Access to safe abortion within the limits of the law.
    Rao KA; Faúndes A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):421-32. PubMed ID: 16563871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice.
    Rowlands S; Thomas K
    Int J Womens Health; 2020; 12():577-586. PubMed ID: 32801935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Access to knowledge and the Global Abortion Policies Database.
    Erdman JN; Johnson BR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 142(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 29656526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.
    Dixon-Mueller R
    Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 2332264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global Abortion Policies Database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards.
    Johnson BR; Lavelanet AF; Schlitt S
    BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2018 Sep; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 30208877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.