These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35725586)
1. Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes. Bieganowski T; Buchalter DB; Singh V; Mercuri JJ; Aggarwal VK; Rozell JC; Schwarzkopf R Knee Surg Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 34(1):30. PubMed ID: 35725586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tibial bone defect prediction based on preoperative artefact-reduced CT imaging is superior to standard radiograph assessment. Brenneis M; Flevas DA; Bornes TD; Braun S; Meurer A; Sculco PK; Quevedo-González FJ; Boettner F Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Nov; 31(11):4842-4850. PubMed ID: 37558747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Mancuso F; Beltrame A; Colombo E; Miani E; Bassini F Acta Biomed; 2017 Jun; 88(2S):98-111. PubMed ID: 28657571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases. Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mid-term Survivorship and Functional Outcomes of Metaphyseal Sleeves for Addressing Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type 2 and 3 Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Hippalgaonkar K; Rajeev Reddy K; Mulpur P; Jayakumar T; Joshi S; Reddy AVG Cureus; 2024 Sep; 16(9):e69381. PubMed ID: 39403644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty and current treatment options. Jabbal M; Simpson AHR; Walmsley P Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2023; 15():75359. PubMed ID: 37405274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results. Rodríguez-Merchán EC; Gómez-Cardero P; Encinas-Ullán CA EFORT Open Rev; 2021 Nov; 6(11):1073-1086. PubMed ID: 34909226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature. Zanirato A; Formica M; Cavagnaro L; Divano S; Burastero G; Felli L Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 30879231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Excellent mid-term osseointegration and implant survival using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty. Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Hauer G; Leitner L; Leithner A; Glehr M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3843-3848. PubMed ID: 32006076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review. Khan Y; Arora S; Kashyap A; Patralekh MK; Maini L Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jan; 143(1):453-468. PubMed ID: 35780426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report. Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tibial revision knee arthroplasty: influence of modular stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility in AORI Type T2a defects. Nadorf J; Gantz S; Kohl K; Kretzer JP Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Nov; 39(10):534-540. PubMed ID: 27834448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Distal femur replacement in extensive defects of the distal femur in revision arthroplasty]. Kohlhof H; Jaenisch M; Koop S; Friedrich M; Wirtz CD Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Aug; 32(4):340-358. PubMed ID: 32719994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation. Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility. Nadorf J; Kinkel S; Gantz S; Jakubowitz E; Kretzer JP PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177285. PubMed ID: 28481956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: options and current trends. Aggarwal AK; Baburaj V Musculoskelet Surg; 2021 Apr; 105(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 33058073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Techniques for filling tibiofemoral bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty. Huten D; Pasquier G; Lambotte JC Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1S):102776. PubMed ID: 33321231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature. Divano S; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Basso M; Felli L; Formica M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jun; 138(6):851-863. PubMed ID: 29671089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]