These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35725715)

  • 1. Improved Glass Bead-Vortex Oscillation Method for DNA Extraction from Diatom.
    Cai J; Wang B; Hu SL; Qu YH; Song T; Chen JH; Deng JQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 38(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 35725715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction of Diatom DNA from Water Samples and Tissues.
    Zhou YC; Wang B; Cai J; Xu YZ; Qin XS; Ha S; Cong B; Chen JH; Deng JQ
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Nov; (201):. PubMed ID: 38009730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
    Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples.
    Khan D; Thomas SA; Tientcheu PE; Suso SMS; Dupont C; Kwambana-Adams B; Mohammed NI; Nicol MP; Antonio M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289557. PubMed ID: 37535692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture.
    Pearman JK; Keeley NB; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Thomson-Laing G; Biessy L; Atalah J; Pochon X
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10231. PubMed ID: 33194417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of 18S rRNA gene arrays for forensic detection of diatoms.
    Jiang L; Xiao C; Zhao J; Jiang T; Lin J; Xu Q; Liu C; Cai W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110482. PubMed ID: 33142211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PCR-based identification of drowning: four case reports.
    Rácz E; Könczöl F; Tóth D; Patonai Z; Porpáczy Z; Kozma Z; Poór VS; Sipos K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Sep; 130(5):1303-7. PubMed ID: 27080711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.
    Claassen S; du Toit E; Kaba M; Moodley C; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Aug; 94(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 23684993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional diatom testing using strong acid: Notable false-positive results caused by an underestimated contamination source (blind spot).
    Kakizaki E; Shinkawa N; Sonoda A; Yukawa N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111131. PubMed ID: 34891083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for bone marrow extraction of diatoms for forensic science applications.
    Marshall M; Chraïbi V; Morgan R
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1343-1351. PubMed ID: 37287340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study on diatom morphology and molecular identification in drowning cases.
    Liu M; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Li Y; Wu P; Zhou S; Ren L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110552. PubMed ID: 33147546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative analysis between diatom nitric acid digestion method and plankton 16S rDNA PCR method].
    Han JG; Wang CB; Li XB; Fan YY; Feng XP
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 29(5):356-9. PubMed ID: 24466776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of DNA extraction techniques for the recovery of bovine DNA from fly larvae crops.
    Cantu C; Bucheli S; Houston R
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 35179225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Clostridium botulinum group III in environmental samples from farms by real-time PCR using four commercial DNA extraction kits.
    Le Maréchal C; Fourour S; Ballan V; Rouxel S; Souillard R; Chemaly M
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):441. PubMed ID: 29973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of ethanol or long-time reaction on the diatom test in water samples using sodium hypochlorite.
    Tsuneya S; Nakajima M; Makino Y; Torimitsu S; Yamaguchi R; Iwase H
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Jul; 57():102054. PubMed ID: 35279533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of molecular tools for the detection of freshwater diatoms.
    Nguyen TN; Berzano M; Gualerzi CO; Spurio R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Jan; 84(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 20955737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Different Protocols for the Extraction of Microbial DNA Inhabiting Synthetic Mars Simulant Soil.
    Wang H; Pijl A; Liu B; Wamelink W; Korthals GW; Costa OYA; Kuramae EE
    Microorganisms; 2024 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 38674704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA extraction from paraffin embedded colorectal carcinoma samples: A comparison study of manual
    Kovacs Z; Jung I; Csernak E; Szentirmay Z; Banias L; Rigmanyi G; Gurzu S
    World J Clin Oncol; 2019 Sep; 10(9):307-317. PubMed ID: 31572667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple digestion method with a Lefort aqua regia solution for diatom extraction.
    Wang H; Liu Y; Zhao J; Hu S; Wang Y; Liu C; Zhang Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S227-30. PubMed ID: 25399968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of DNA extraction procedures for
    Amoah ID; Singh G; Troell K; Reddy P; Stenström TA; Bux F
    J Helminthol; 2019 Aug; 94():e78. PubMed ID: 31455433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.