211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35727261)
1. Survival and Mechanical Complications of Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations Using Prefabricated Titanium Abutments: A Medium- and Long-Term Retrospective Analysis with up to 10 Years Follow-up.
Di Francesco F; De Marco G; Cristache CM; Vernal R; Cafferata EA; Lanza A
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):278-286. PubMed ID: 35727261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival and mechanical complications of single- and multiple-unit cement-retained posterior implant-supported restorations with custom CAD/CAM Atlantis titanium abutments: An up to 10-year retrospective analysis.
Di Francesco F; Cristache CM; Minervini G; Cafferata EA; Lanza A
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2023 Nov; 16(4):315-324. PubMed ID: 37994819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of two-piece zirconia abutments with bonded titanium inserts for implant-supported restorations.
Lin YT; Shen YF; Wei PC; Hsu KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):449-454. PubMed ID: 31307812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective and Clinical Evaluation of Aftermarket CAD/CAM Titanium Abutments Supporting Posterior Splinted Prostheses and Single Crowns.
Hsu KW; Wei PC; Chen YL; Liou EJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1161–1168. PubMed ID: 30892291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Aug; 33(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 35633183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SURVIVAL RATE OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SINGLE-TOOTH RESTORATIONS BASED ON ZIRCONIA OR METAL ABUTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TOOTH AGENESIS: A 5-YEARS PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Gotfredsen K
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2024 Jun; 24(2):101970. PubMed ID: 38821661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.
Cantner F; Cacaci C; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 30887188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
