These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35728945)

  • 61. Roe v. Wade. Wayward women.
    Petchesky R; Joffe C
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 12178888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Uniting to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
    Lynch D
    Sun; 1994 Feb; ():18A. PubMed ID: 12287871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.
    Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L
    Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Medicaid assistance for elective abortions: the statutory and constitutional issues.
    Unger ZM
    St Johns Law Rev; 1976; 50(4):751-70. PubMed ID: 11663170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The agenda for family planning in the USSR.
    Taniguchi H
    Integration; 1991 Sep; (29):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The abortion scene: a second look.
    McEwan J
    Practitioner; 1983 May; 227(1379):759-64. PubMed ID: 6889243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
    Bayer R
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. House refuses to remove ban on abortions in overseas military hospitals.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Jun; 4(13):6. PubMed ID: 12346293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
    Cameron ST; Glasier AF; Logan J; Benton L; Baird DT
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 8968240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Eliminating the high abortion related complications and deaths in Cameroon: the restrictive legal atmosphere on abortions is no acceptable excuse.
    Bain LE; Kongnyuy EJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 29793462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluating abortion counselling.
    Marcus RJ
    Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Aug; 56(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 467830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Statutory Prohibition on Use of Appropriated Funds in Programs Where Abortion is a Method of Family Planning; Standard of Compliance for Family Planning Services Projects, 29 January 1988.
    United States. Department of Health and Human Services DHHS
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():13, 299-301. PubMed ID: 12289184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law.
    Nowicka W
    Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Abortion.
    Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 May; 4(2):1-27. PubMed ID: 12286571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Bound and gagged: America's family planning network.
    Dryfoos JG
    J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10116482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. New York v. Bowen.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. New York
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 690():1261-74. PubMed ID: 11648393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.