289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35729738)
21. The Combined Interpretation of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Classification System With Prognostic Impact.
Hayes AR; Furtado O'Mahony L; Quigley AM; Gnanasegaran G; Caplin ME; Navalkissoor S; Toumpanakis C
Clin Nucl Med; 2022 Jan; 47(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 34874347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combined imaging with 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on the basis of volumetric parameters in neuroendocrine tumors.
Abdulrezzak U; Kurt YK; Kula M; Tutus A
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Aug; 37(8):874-81. PubMed ID: 27096719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment 2-[
Albano D; Dondi F; Mazzoletti A; Bellini P; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(5):. PubMed ID: 34069203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metabolic parameters of pretreatment 2-[
Li C; Dong Y; Pan Y; Han Y; Zhang J; Luan X; Liu J; Xu X; Guan Z; Wang G; Xu B
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):604-617. PubMed ID: 38223061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a long-term evaluation.
Bahri H; Laurence L; Edeline J; Leghzali H; Devillers A; Raoul JL; Cuggia M; Mesbah H; Clement B; Boucher E; Garin E
J Nucl Med; 2014 Nov; 55(11):1786-90. PubMed ID: 25286923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27.
Satoh K; Sadowski SM; Dieckmann W; Quezado M; Nilubol N; Kebebew E; Patel D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):714-721. PubMed ID: 27638678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on Clinical Management in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Panagiotidis E; Alshammari A; Michopoulou S; Skoura E; Naik K; Maragkoudakis E; Mohmaduvesh M; Al-Harbi M; Belda M; Caplin ME; Toumpanakis C; Bomanji J
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 58(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 27516446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tumor metabolic and secondary lymphoid organ metabolic markers on 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predict prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer.
Jin P; Bai M; Liu J; Yu J; Meng X
Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1004351. PubMed ID: 36341372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of survival of the patients with metastatic rectal cancer by staging
Agüloğlu N; Aksu A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 36162744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Metabolic tumor volume derived from
Ding C; Mao X; Li N; Huang M; Huang Z; Bao W; Li H; Fan J
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 35503557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Volumetric parameters on
Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metabolic parameters on baseline
Kwon HR; Cho J; Park S; Lee SH; Ahn MJ; Choi JY; Lee KH; Jung HA; Moon SH
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():896494. PubMed ID: 36226146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Mayoral M; Fernandez-Martinez A; Vidal L; Fuster D; Aya F; Pavia J; Pons F; Lomeña F; Paredes P
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 26541072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Baseline Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured with Fixed or Different Adaptive Thresholding Methods Equally Predicts Outcome in Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma.
Cottereau AS; Hapdey S; Chartier L; Modzelewski R; Casasnovas O; Itti E; Tilly H; Vera P; Meignan MA; Becker S
J Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 58(2):276-281. PubMed ID: 27754905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic value of
Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
Qin C; Shao F; Hu F; Song W; Song Y; Guo J; Lan X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 31807883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of total metabolic tumour volume and therapy-response assessment by [
Annovazzi A; Ferraresi V; Rea S; Russillo M; Renna D; Carpano S; Sciuto R
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3398-3407. PubMed ID: 34779873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
