168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35730247)
1. Usability of a navigation application for travel in Quebec City with wheeled mobility device and, further validation of the Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology.
Vincent C; Levac S; Dumont F; Archambault PS; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):367-382. PubMed ID: 35730247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology (ESGAT): a methodological and usability study.
Vincent C; Girard R; Dumont F; Archambault P; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):134-151. PubMed ID: 32501781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Iranian translation and psychometric of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with Assistive technology (QUEST2.0) on wheelchair users.
DavoudianTalab AH; Mokaramiyan S; Kamari Ghanavati F
Disabil Rehabil; 2024 May; 46(10):2125-2129. PubMed ID: 37198952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.
D'Souza C; Paquet VL; Lenker JA; Steinfeld E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):109-121. PubMed ID: 29130752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills.
Paulisso DC; Schmeler MR; Schein RM; Allegretti ALC; Campos LCB; Costa JD; Fachin-Martins E; Cruz DMCD
Assist Technol; 2021 Sep; 33(5):264-270. PubMed ID: 31207193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accessibility information in New Delhi for "Ease
Agarwal Y
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Oct; 14(7):645-662. PubMed ID: 29902941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419.
Xavier Macedo de Azevedo F; Heimgärtner R; Nebe K
Ergonomics; 2023 Jun; 66(6):821-848. PubMed ID: 36137226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Functionality and Usability of Two Novel Wheelchair Anti-Rollback Devices for Ramp Ascent in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.
Deems-Dluhy SL; Jayaraman C; Green S; Albert MV; Jayaraman A
PM R; 2017 May; 9(5):483-493. PubMed ID: 27664403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.
Auger C; Demers L; Gélinas I; Routhier F; Mortenson WB; Miller WC
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jun; 42(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 20549163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception of autonomy among people who use wheeled mobility assistive devices: Dependence on the type of wheeled assistive technology.
Khalili M; Jonathan C; Hocking N; Van Der Loos M; Mortenson B; Borisoff JF
Assist Technol; 2022 Nov; 34(6):725-733. PubMed ID: 34029174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Needs for mobility devices, home modifications and personal assistance among Canadians with disabilities.
Giesbrecht EM; Smith EM; Mortenson WB; Miller WC
Health Rep; 2017 Aug; 28(8):9-15. PubMed ID: 29044443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device.
Colucci M; Tofani M; Trioschi D; Guarino D; Berardi A; Galeoto G
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Apr; 16(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 31553245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adult Scandinavians' use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use.
Sund T; Brandt Å
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Apr; 13(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 28366104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The validity and applicability of the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology for people with spinal cord injury.
Chan SC; Chan AP
Assist Technol; 2006; 18(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 16796239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Users' satisfaction and experiences in using assistive devices distributed by a rehabilitation centre in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
Nuri RP; Xu X; Aldersey HM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):868-877. PubMed ID: 36215415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability.
Arthanat S; Bauer SM; Lenker JA; Nochajski SM; Wu YW
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2007 Jul; 2(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 19263540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation.
Gudjonsdottir B; Gudmundsdottir SB
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):722-729. PubMed ID: 34102088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
