These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35731445)

  • 1. Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.
    Finze A; Betzler J; Hetjens S; Reissfelder C; Otto M; Blank S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 35731445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
    Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
    Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
    Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Kanamori J; Watanabe M; Maruyama S; Kanie Y; Kuriyama K; Terayama M; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Okamura A; Imamura Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jul; 17(3):e13340. PubMed ID: 38925165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Technical Modification to the Circular Stapling Anastomosis Technique During Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Procedure.
    Valmasoni M; Capovilla G; Pierobon ES; Moletta L; Provenzano L; Costantini M; Salvador R; Merigliano S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1585-1591. PubMed ID: 31580751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
    Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
    Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
    Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
    Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
    Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a matched-pair single-center cohort analysis.
    Chouliaras K; Attwood K; Brady M; Takahashi H; Peng JS; Yendamuri S; Demmy TL; Hochwald SN; Kukar M
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35758409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
    Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.