163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35733398)
1. Propensity score matching and stratification using multiparty data without pooling.
Wang J; Marion-Gallois R
Pharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 22(1):4-19. PubMed ID: 35733398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.
Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison.
Remiro-Azócar A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):217. PubMed ID: 35941551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the comparability of osteoporosis treatments using propensity score and negative control outcome methods in UK and Denmark electronic health record databases.
Tan EH; Rathod-Mistry T; Strauss VY; O'Kelly J; Giorgianni F; Baxter R; Brunetti VC; Pedersen AB; Ehrenstein V; Prieto-Alhambra D
J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28454568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning.
Loiseau N; Trichelair P; He M; Andreux M; Zaslavskiy M; Wainrib G; Blum MGB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):335. PubMed ID: 36577946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.
Desai RJ; Rothman KJ; Bateman BT; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF
Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 27922533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.
Wyss R; Ellis AR; Brookhart MA; Girman CJ; Jonsson Funk M; LoCasale R; Stürmer T
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 25143475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of propensity scores, disease risk scores, and regression in confounder adjustment for the safety of emerging treatment with group sequential monitoring.
Xu S; Shetterly S; Cook AJ; Raebel MA; Goonesekera S; Shoaibi A; Roy J; Fireman B
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 26875591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.
Hade EM; Lu B
Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: the overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data.
Wan W; Murugesan M; Nocon RS; Bolton J; Konetzka RT; Chin MH; Huang ES
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38831393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Covariate balance-related propensity score weighting in estimating overall hazard ratio with distributed survival data.
Huang C; Wei K; Wang C; Yu Y; Qin G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):233. PubMed ID: 37833641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Leveraging external evidence using Bayesian hierarchical model and propensity score in the presence of covariates.
Chen X; Yao Y; Wang L; Mukhopadhyay S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Sep; 132():107301. PubMed ID: 37467950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
