These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35733489)

  • 1. Evaluation of Spinal Alignment and Clinical Findings for the Efficacy of One-Stage Surgery in Tandem Spinal Stenosis.
    Kobayashi T; Yawara E; Suzuki M; Sato T; Mizutani M; Yamanaka H; Tamai H; Orita S; Inage K; Shiga Y; Maki S; Nakamura J; Hagiwara S; Aoki Y; Inoue M; Koda M; Takahashi H; Akazawa T; Ohtori S
    Cureus; 2022 May; 14(5):e25130. PubMed ID: 35733489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Spinopelvic Alignment on the Clinical Outcomes Following Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis.
    Varol E
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46302. PubMed ID: 37790867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of sagittal imbalance correction on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF for LSS.
    Jia J; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 181():119-126. PubMed ID: 31039493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain.
    Li J; Zhang D; Shen Y; Qi X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):326. PubMed ID: 32795374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associations between sarcopenia and degenerative lumbar scoliosis in older women.
    Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Yamanaka H; Tamai H; Kobayashi T; Orita S; Yamauchi K; Suzuki M; Inage K; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Aoki Y; Toyone T; Ozawa T; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
    Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2017; 12():9. PubMed ID: 28331906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Shinozaki Y; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Ogawa J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Apr; 30(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 30684939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change of Clinical and Radiologic Parameters after Minimally Invasive Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Study with Long-term Follow-up.
    Pennisi G; D'Ercole M; Izzo A; Polli FM; Rapisarda A; Papacci F; Olivi A; Montano N
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 85(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 35901813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study.
    Bouknaitir JB; Carreon LY; Brorson S; Andersen MØ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Jul; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 34996042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the difference between lumbar lordosis in the supine and standing positions on the clinical outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Nakano S; Inoue M; Takahashi H; Kubota G; Saito J; Norimoto M; Koyama K; Watanabe A; Nakajima T; Sato Y; Ohyama S; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Inage K; Shiga Y; Sonobe M; Nakajima A; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K; Aoki Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Apr; 36(4):542-548. PubMed ID: 34715669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.
    Than KD; Park P; Fu KM; Nguyen S; Wang MY; Chou D; Nunley PD; Anand N; Fessler RG; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Akbarnia BA; Deviren V; Uribe JS; La Marca F; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 26943254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Protopsaltis TS; Scheer JK; Terran JS; Smith JS; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Hart RA; McCarthy IM; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 25978077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity.
    Park P; Wang MY; Lafage V; Nguyen S; Ziewacz J; Okonkwo DO; Uribe JS; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Haque R; Fessler RG; Kanter AS; Deviren V; La Marca F; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 25635632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cervical range of motion on the global spinal alignment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Zhao SZ; Qian BP; Qiu Y; Wang B; Huang JC; Qiao M
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 31525472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effectiveness of short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative scoliosis with a Cobb angle of 20-40° combined with spinal stenosis].
    Li Y; Ou Y; Zhu Y; Zhao Z; Luo W; Xu S; Yu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 34(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 32174071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.