146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35733623)
1. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.
Wear K; Shah A; Ivory AM; Baker C
IEEE Int Ultrason Symp; 2020; NA():1-4. PubMed ID: 35733623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.
Wear KA; Shah A; Ivory AM; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 33186103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):358-375. PubMed ID: 33186102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.
Wear K; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Int Ultrason Symp; 2020; NA():1-4. PubMed ID: 35765664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.
Wear KA; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Dec; 67(12):2674-2691. PubMed ID: 32746206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.
Wear KA; Howard SM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Sep; 66(9):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 31247548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 35133964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.
Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 24402896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probing acoustic fields of clinically relevant transducers: the effect of hydrophone probes' finite apertures and bandwidths.
Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1262-70. PubMed ID: 15553510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.
Liu Y; Wear KA; Harris GR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 28735734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of finite aperture and frequency response of ultrasonic hydrophone probes on the determination of acoustic output.
Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Berger WA
Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):367-72. PubMed ID: 15047313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.
Wear KA; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1257-1267. PubMed ID: 35143394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.
Wear KA; Liu Y
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 30530327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Practicalities of Obtaining and Using Hydrophone Calibration Data to Derive Pressure Waveforms.
Hurrell AM; Rajagopal S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):126-140. PubMed ID: 27479961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):318-339. PubMed ID: 30530326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones.
Wear KA; Shah A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.
Wear K; Liu Y; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Jan; 62(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 25585399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust spot-poled membrane hydrophones for measurement of large amplitude pressure waveforms generated by high intensity therapeutic ultrasonic transducers.
Wilkens V; Sonntag S; Georg O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1319-32. PubMed ID: 27036269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Membrane hydrophone measurement and numerical simulation of HIFU fields up to developed shock regimes.
Bessonova OV; Wilkens V
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Feb; 60(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 23357903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.
Wear KA; Baker C; Miloro P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Nov; 66(11):1723-1730. PubMed ID: 31352340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
