193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35735647)
1. Accuracy of Mini-Implant Placement Using a Computer-Aided Designed Surgical Guide, with Information of Intraoral Scan and the Use of a Cone-Beam CT.
Vasoglou G; Stefanidaki I; Apostolopoulos K; Fotakidou E; Vasoglou M
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 35735647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Yu JJ; Kim GT; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Paek J; Kim SH; Huang JC
Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 21875317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up.
Tallarico M; Xhanari E; Kim YJ; Cocchi F; Martinolli M; Alushi A; Baldoni EE; Meloni SM
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 31090750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical application of a stereolithographic surgical guide for simple positioning of orthodontic mini-implants.
Kim SH; Kang JM; Choi B; Nelson G
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 19146019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Intraoral Scanning Accurate to Evaluate Dental Implant Position? An In-Vitro Study.
Bergamaschi IP; Cortellazzi KL; Sverzut AT
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 81(4):441-455. PubMed ID: 36584976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
Kiatkroekkrai P; Takolpuckdee C; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study.
Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
J Dent; 2024 Jun; ():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-Implant Insertion Using a Guide Manufactured with Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing in an Adolescent Patient Suffering from Tooth Eruption Disturbance.
Weismann C; Heise K; Aretxabaleta M; Cetindis M; Koos B; Schulz MC
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 38247968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of orthodontic mini-implants placed at the anterior palate by tooth-borne or gingiva-borne guide support: a cadaveric study.
Möhlhenrich SC; Brandt M; Kniha K; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Wolf M; Peters F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4425-4431. PubMed ID: 30982181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-Guided Approach for Placement of Zygomatic Implants: Novel Protocol and Surgical Guide.
Rinaldi M; Ganz SD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 30829495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial.
Ngamprasertkit C; Aunmeungthong W; Khongkhunthian P
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 34164754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.
Ashil AM; Sharma A; Jose LK; Grover S; Kochar AS; Varghese ST; Sharma T; Ismail PMS
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S927-S929. PubMed ID: 38595369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
