These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35737414)
1. Promoting the Values for Surrogate Decision-making. Wendler D JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(3):243-244. PubMed ID: 35737414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surrogate decision making. Lipman HI Am J Geriatr Cardiol; 2008; 17(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 18326947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making -- another look. Johansson M; Broström L Bioethics; 2011 Jun; 25(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 19874290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates. Berger JT Am J Bioeth; 2020 Feb; 20(2):44-48. PubMed ID: 31990251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate decision makers: what if a surrogate cannot decide? Anderson J JAAPA; 2012 Feb; 25(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 22416559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family. Shepherd L Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):575-95. PubMed ID: 16715563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment. Johansson M; Broström L Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making. Pope TM Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age? Moore JA; Gallagher CM Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age. Tsai NT Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony. Wahlert L Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age. Burke TB Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence. Feltz A; Abt T Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making. Sulmasy DP; Snyder L JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(17):1946-7. PubMed ID: 21045102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients. Krupp AN West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age". Berg J Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22974042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical understandings of proxy decision making for research involving adults lacking capacity: A systematic review (framework synthesis) of empirical research. Shepherd V; Hood K; Sheehan M; Griffith R; Jordan A; Wood F AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(4):267-286. PubMed ID: 30321110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]