250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35737734)
1. Accuracy of two deep learning-based reconstruction methods compared with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method for solid and ground-glass nodule volumetry on low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography: A phantom study.
Kim C; Kwack T; Kim W; Cha J; Yang Z; Yong HS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270122. PubMed ID: 35737734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for CT Volumetry of Part-Solid Nodules and Solid Nodules in Comparison with Filtered Back Projection and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction at Various Dose Settings: An Anthropomorphic Chest Phantom Study.
Kim SK; Kim C; Lee KY; Cha J; Lim HJ; Kang EY; Oh YW
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 20(7):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 31270983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Learning Reconstruction Shows Better Lung Nodule Detection for Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT.
Jiang B; Li N; Shi X; Zhang S; Li J; de Bock GH; Vliegenthart R; Xie X
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):202-212. PubMed ID: 35040674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep-learning reconstruction for ultra-low-dose lung CT: Volumetric measurement accuracy and reproducibility of artificial ground-glass nodules in a phantom study.
Mikayama R; Shirasaka T; Kojima T; Sakai Y; Yabuuchi H; Kondo M; Kato T
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210915. PubMed ID: 34908478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels.
Svalkvist A; Fagman E; Vikgren J; Ku S; Diniz MO; Norrlund RR; Johnsson ÅA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 24(3):e13871. PubMed ID: 36583696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the image quality and auto-analysis of pulmonary nodules at ultra-low dose chest CT: a phantom study.
Yao Y; Guo B; Li J; Yang Q; Li X; Deng L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 May; 12(5):2777-2791. PubMed ID: 35502370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study.
Doo KW; Kang EY; Yong HS; Woo OH; Lee KY; Oh YW
Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20130644. PubMed ID: 25026866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity can be reliably measured with low-dose techniques regardless of iterative reconstruction: results of a phantom study.
Siegelman JW; Supanich MP; Gavrielides MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1242-7. PubMed ID: 26001234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study.
Franck C; Zhang G; Deak P; Zanca F
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():86-93. PubMed ID: 33445125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical value of a new generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodule in low-dose chest CT.
Tang H; Liu Z; Hu Z; He T; Li D; Yu N; Jia Y; Shi H
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20180909. PubMed ID: 31469289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A phantom study using dual-energy spectral computed tomography imaging: Comparison of image quality between two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms for evaluating ground-glass nodules of the lung.
Li J; Gao J; Wang G; Cui D; Deng K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021 Dec; 17(7):1742-1747. PubMed ID: 35381748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.
Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra-low-dose spectral-detector computed tomography for the accurate quantification of pulmonary nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study.
Zhou X; Zhang H; Jin X; Zhang X; Lu X; Han Q; Xiong X; Liu T; Feng Y; Tu W; Zhou T; Ge Y; Dong P; Liu S; Fan L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 37559745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of multidetector computed tomography scan parameters, novel reconstruction settings, and lung nodule characteristics on nodule diameter measurements: A phantom study.
Au C; Reeves R; Li Z; Gingold E; Halpern E; Sundaram B
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3936-3943. PubMed ID: 35358333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in a phantom study: Effect of axial-volume scan and iterative reconstruction algorithm.
Lee HN; Kim JI; Shin SY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(23):e20543. PubMed ID: 32502015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Katsura M; Matsuda I; Akahane M; Yasaka K; Hanaoka S; Akai H; Sato J; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 23344517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study.
Linning E; Daqing M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low-dose CT reconstructed with ASiR-V using SmartmA for pulmonary nodule detection and Lung-RADS classifications compared with low-dose CT.
Ye K; Chen M; Li J; Zhu Q; Lu Y; Yuan H
Clin Radiol; 2021 Feb; 76(2):156.e1-156.e8. PubMed ID: 33293025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
