These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35738073)

  • 1. Rational capacity and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 83():101809. PubMed ID: 35738073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rationality Was Lost on the United States Supreme Court in Its
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2022 Mar; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 34933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arizona's Insanity Defense,
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):618-622. PubMed ID: 34479941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Landess JS; Holoyda BJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 33789990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2021 Jan; 72(1):104-106. PubMed ID: 33167811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abolition of the insanity defense violates due process.
    Morse SJ; Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 24335319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reshaping Insanity in Pakistani Law: The Case of Safia Bano.
    Munir MA; Wright B
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):301-313. PubMed ID: 38344793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updating toxic psychosis into 21st-century Canadian: Bouchard-Lebrun v. R.
    Watts J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(3):374-81. PubMed ID: 24051590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mental health criminal defenses in persons with neuropsychiatric disorders.
    Frierson RL; Joshi KG
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 37966983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commentary: the insanity defense and youths in juvenile court.
    Rogers JE; Myers WC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 24335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Hiromoto L; Sparr LF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2023 Mar; 51(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 36627152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
    Young G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competence to stand trial should require rational understanding.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 21389162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
    Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurologic disorder and criminal responsibility.
    Yaffe G
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2013; 118():345-56. PubMed ID: 24182391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
    Wortzel H; Metzner J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.