157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35738145)
21. Mitigating fugitive methane emissions from closed landfills: A pilot-scale field study.
Nelson B; Zytner RG; Dulac Y; Cabral AR
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 2):158351. PubMed ID: 36049680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determination of gas recovery efficiency at two Danish landfills by performing downwind methane measurements and stable carbon isotopic analysis.
Aghdam EF; Fredenslund AM; Chanton J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():220-229. PubMed ID: 29249311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.
Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():835-859. PubMed ID: 30660403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Landfill Gas Exposure on Vegetation in Engineered Landfill Biocover Systems Implemented to Minimize Fugitive Methane Emissions from Landfills.
Attalage DS; Hettiaratchi JPA; Chu A; Pokhrel D; Jayasinghe PA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method.
Mønster J; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():177-86. PubMed ID: 25442105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of a biologically active cover for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.
Barlaz MA; Green RB; Chanton JP; Goldsmith CD; Hater GR
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Sep; 38(18):4891-9. PubMed ID: 15487801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suitability assessment of dumpsite soil biocover to reduce methane emission from landfills under interactive influence of nutrients.
Bajar S; Singh A; Kaushik CP; Kaushik A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jan; 28(2):1519-1532. PubMed ID: 32840750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hotspot detection and spatial distribution of methane emissions from landfills by a surface probe method.
Gonzalez-Valencia R; Magana-Rodriguez F; Cristóbal J; Thalasso F
Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():299-305. PubMed ID: 26973281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of compost biocovers on gas flow and methane oxidation in a landfill cover.
Abichou T; Mahieu K; Yuan L; Chanton J; Hater G
Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1595-601. PubMed ID: 19131233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation and statistical optimization of methane oxidation using rice husk amended dumpsite soil as biocover.
Bajar S; Singh A; Kaushik CP; Kaushik A
Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():136-43. PubMed ID: 26452424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of green waste biocovers for enhancing methane oxidation.
Mei C; Yazdani R; Han B; Mostafid ME; Chanton J; VanderGheynst J; Imhoff P
Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():205-15. PubMed ID: 25792440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Closing the methane mass balance for an old closed Danish landfill.
Fjelsted L; Christensen AG; Larsen JE; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():179-189. PubMed ID: 31678804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A simulation model for methane emissions from landfills with interaction of vegetation and cover soil.
Bian R; Xin D; Chai X
Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():267-276. PubMed ID: 29050973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of respiration in compost landfill biocovers intended for methane oxidation.
Scheutz C; Pedicone A; Pedersen GB; Kjeldsen P
Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 21292472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of total landfill surface methane emissions using geospatial approach combined with measured surface ambient air methane concentrations.
Abichou T; Del'Angel JM; Koloushani M; Stamatiou K; Belhadj Ali N; Green R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):902-913. PubMed ID: 37843284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes.
Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Viviani G
Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2108-15. PubMed ID: 23465313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Methane oxidation in landfill waste biocover soil: kinetics and sensitivity to ambient conditions.
Wang J; Xia FF; Bai Y; Fang CR; Shen DS; He R
Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):864-70. PubMed ID: 21324662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensitivity of methanotrophic community structure, abundance, and gene expression to CH4 and O2 in simulated landfill biocover soil.
Li H; Chi Z; Lu W; Wang H
Environ Pollut; 2014 Jan; 184():347-53. PubMed ID: 24095811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization of methane oxidation in a simulated landfill cover system by comparing molecular and stable isotope mass balances.
Schulte M; Jochmann MA; Gehrke T; Thom A; Ricken T; Denecke M; Schmidt TC
Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():281-288. PubMed ID: 28811145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of a low-maintenance measurement approach to continuously estimate methane emissions: A case study.
Riddick SN; Hancock BR; Robinson AD; Connors S; Davies S; Allen G; Pitt J; Harris NRP
Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():210-219. PubMed ID: 28003116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
