135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35739239)
1. Modelling of life cycle cost of conventional and alternative vehicles.
Furch J; Konečný V; Krobot Z
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10661. PubMed ID: 35739239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.
Luk JM; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8215-8228. PubMed ID: 28714678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life cycle air emissions impacts and ownership costs of light-duty vehicles using natural gas as a primary energy source.
Luk JM; Saville BA; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5151-60. PubMed ID: 25825338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental and human health impact of different powertrain passenger cars in a life cycle perspective. A focus on health risk and oxidative potential of particulate matter components.
Sisani F; Di Maria F; Cesari D
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150171. PubMed ID: 34537714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle water footprint of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China.
Yang L; Chen H; Li H; Feng Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(33):80442-80461. PubMed ID: 37300733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits.
Michalek JJ; Chester M; Jaramillo P; Samaras C; Shiau CS; Lave LB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(40):16554-8. PubMed ID: 21949359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.
Peshin T; Sengupta S; Azevedo IML
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(13):9569-9582. PubMed ID: 35696339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution caused by light and heavy duty vehicles with battery-electric, fuel cell-electric and catenary trucks.
Breuer JL; Samsun RC; Stolten D; Peters R
Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106474. PubMed ID: 33711760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the emission factors of air pollutants from gasoline, CNG, LPG and diesel fueled vehicles at idle speed.
Aosaf MR; Wang Y; Du K
Environ Pollut; 2022 Jul; 305():119296. PubMed ID: 35427677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Life Cycle Air Emissions External Costs Assessment for Comparing Electric and Traditional Passenger Cars.
Girardi P; Brambilla C; Mela G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Jan; 16(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 31502735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of black carbon emissions from in-use light-duty passenger vehicles.
Zheng X; Zhang S; Wu Y; Zhang KM; Wu X; Li Z; Hao J
Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):348-356. PubMed ID: 28810204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for in-use measurement and evaluation of the activity, fuel use, electricity use, and emissions of a plug-in hybrid diesel-electric school bus.
Choi HW; Frey HC
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3601-7. PubMed ID: 20380435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of ambient temperature and powertrains of SUVs on the environment in Slovakia during the use phase.
Sečkár M; Schwarz M
Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jul; 196(8):704. PubMed ID: 38967806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.
Elgowainy A; Han J; Ward J; Joseck F; Gohlke D; Lindauer A; Ramsden T; Biddy M; Alexander M; Barnhart S; Sutherland I; Verduzco L; Wallington TJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):2392-2399. PubMed ID: 29298387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-use measurement of activity, energy use, and emissions of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.
Graver BM; Frey HC; Choi HW
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):9044-51. PubMed ID: 21902202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Life cycle CO
Yu R; Cong L; Hui Y; Zhao D; Yu B
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154102. PubMed ID: 35218846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electric vehicles in China: emissions and health impacts.
Ji S; Cherry CR; J Bechle M; Wu Y; Marshall JD
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(4):2018-24. PubMed ID: 22201325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Study on the Routing Problem of Electric and Fuel Vehicles Considering Carbon Trading.
Liao W; Liu L; Fu J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 31461949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
