171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35739518)
21. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.
Vasak C; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Strbac G; Schemper M; Zechner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Accuracy evaluation of computer aided design and computer aided manufacture template for implant placement].
Liu H; Liu DX; Wang KT; Wang CL; Zhao Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 28(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 21179688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement.
Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W
J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Positioning Accuracy Between 2 Different Implant Systems Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
Zhu F; Mao M; Zhu H; Chen Y; You J; Pan H
J Oral Implantol; 2022 Feb; 48(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 33710322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of treatment effects during en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth placed using mini-implants placed at infrazygomatic crest and interradicular sites: A randomized controlled trial.
Sreenivasagan S; Subramanian AK; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Feb; 27(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 37292042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
Schneider D; Sancho-Puchades M; Mir-Marí J; Mühlemann S; Jung R; Hämmerle C
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of palatal orthodontic mini-implants placed by conventionally or CAD/CAM-based surgical guides: a comparative in vitro study.
Mang de la Rosa MR; Safaltin A; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Aigner A; Koch PJ
Angle Orthod; 2023 Jan; 93(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 36048244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study.
Brilli D; Cauli I; Cassetta M
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105093. PubMed ID: 38788916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
Alves M; Baratieri C; Nojima LI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
Tavares A; Crusoé-Rebello IM; Neves FS
J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e1015-e1020. PubMed ID: 33262865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computed tomography assessment of maxillary bone density for orthodontic mini-implant placement with respect to vertical growth patterns.
Arvind Tr P; Jain RK
J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 48(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 34053366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
