These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35741400)

  • 1. Possible Event-Related Potential Correlates of Voluntary Attention and Reflexive Attention in the Emei Music Frog.
    Niu W; Shen D; Sun R; Fan Y; Yang J; Zhang B; Fang G
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 35741400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.
    Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Fang G
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2018 Dec; 204(12):1029-1044. PubMed ID: 30377768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical auditory perception for species discrimination and individual recognition in the music frog.
    Fan Y; Fang K; Sun R; Shen D; Yang J; Tang Y; Fang G
    Curr Zool; 2022 Oct; 68(5):581-591. PubMed ID: 36324532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preference of spectral features in auditory processing for advertisement calls in the music frogs.
    Fan Y; Yue X; Yang J; Shen J; Shen D; Tang Y; Fang G
    Front Zool; 2019; 16():13. PubMed ID: 31168310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in vocalization are reflected by event-related potential components in the music frog.
    Shen D; Fang K; Fan Y; Shen J; Yang J; Cui J; Tang Y; Fang G
    Anim Cogn; 2020 May; 23(3):477-490. PubMed ID: 32016618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory neural networks involved in attention modulation prefer biologically significant sounds and exhibit sexual dimorphism in anurans.
    Xue F; Yue X; Fan Y; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Fang G
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Mar; 221(Pt 5):. PubMed ID: 29361582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
    Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in
    Fan Y; Yue X; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Fang G
    Biol Open; 2018 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 30509903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural activities in music frogs reveal call variations and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Nidirana.
    Fang K; Tang Y; Zhang B; Fang G
    Commun Biol; 2022 Jun; 5(1):550. PubMed ID: 35668095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Music-induced positive mood broadens the scope of auditory attention.
    Putkinen V; Makkonen T; Eerola T
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 12(7):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 28460035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The First Call Note Plays a Crucial Role in Frog Vocal Communication.
    Yue X; Fan Y; Xue F; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Fang G
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):10128. PubMed ID: 28860503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception.
    Bidelman GM; Walker BS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 45(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28112440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Considerations in Audio-Visual Interaction Models: An ERP Study of Music Perception by Musicians and Non-musicians.
    Sorati M; Behne DM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():594434. PubMed ID: 33551911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.
    Fang G; Xue F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():77-84. PubMed ID: 24613236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention in auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Alho K
    Psychophysiology; 1992 May; 29(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1626035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.