These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35741481)

  • 1. On the Choice of the Item Response Model for Scaling PISA Data: Model Selection Based on Information Criteria and Quantifying Model Uncertainty.
    Robitzsch A
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 35741481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the Multiverse of Analytical Decisions in Scaling Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: A Specification Curve Analysis for PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2022 Jul; 12(7):731-753. PubMed ID: 35877454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Wu X; Wu R; Chang HH; Kong Q; Zhang Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2230. PubMed ID: 33013581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying and Supporting Academically Low-Performing Schools in a Developing Country: An Application of a Specialized Multilevel IRT Model to PISA-D Assessment Data.
    Langi M; Jeon M
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):332-356. PubMed ID: 36348254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A primer on standardized testing:
    Himelfarb I
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 31169998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance.
    Buchholz J; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 31019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing Sources of Uncertainty in IRT Scale Scores.
    Yang JS; Hansen M; Cai L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2012 Apr; 72(2):264-290. PubMed ID: 23049139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
    Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing item response theory invariance of the standardized Quality-of-life Disease Impact Scale (QDIS(®)) in acute coronary syndrome patients: differential functioning of items and test.
    Deng N; Anatchkova MD; Waring ME; Han KT; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1809-22. PubMed ID: 25601166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Graphical Method for Displaying the Model Fit of Item Response Theory Trace Lines.
    Kalinowski ST
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Dec; 79(6):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 31619840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State-Aware Deep Item Response Theory using student facial features.
    Zhou Y; Suzuki K; Kumano S
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1324279. PubMed ID: 38239499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item Response Theory With Covariates (IRT-C): Assessing Item Recovery and Differential Item Functioning for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model.
    Tay L; Huang Q; Vermunt JK
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Feb; 76(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 29795855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.