178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35741719)
1. A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation.
Hicks T; Buckleton J; Castella V; Evett I; Jackson G
Genes (Basel); 2022 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns.
Biedermann A; Champod C; Jackson G; Gill P; Taylor D; Butler J; Morling N; Hicks T; Vuille J; Taroni F
Front Genet; 2016; 7():215. PubMed ID: 28018424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.
Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA
Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10795422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global survey on evaluative reporting on DNA evidence with regard to activity-level propositions.
Prinz M; Pirtle D; Oldoni F
J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):798-813. PubMed ID: 38351537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting on forensic biology findings given activity level issues in the Netherlands.
Kokshoorn B; Luijsterburg M
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Feb; 343():111545. PubMed ID: 36634430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sharing data on DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery: Arguments for harmonization and standardization.
Kokshoorn B; Aarts LHJ; Ansell R; Connolly E; Drotz W; Kloosterman AD; McKenna LG; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():260-269. PubMed ID: 30273824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. American forensic DNA practitioners' opinion on activity level evaluative reporting.
Yang YJ; Prinz M; McKiernan H; Oldoni F
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1357-1369. PubMed ID: 35568965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA.
Taylor D; Biedermann A; Samie L; Pun KM; Hicks T; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():155-177. PubMed ID: 28273508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.
Marquis R; Biedermann A; Cadola L; Champod C; Gueissaz L; Massonnet G; Mazzella WD; Taroni F; Hicks T
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):364-370. PubMed ID: 27702452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The logic of forensic pathology opinion.
de Boer HH; Fronczek J; Berger CEH; Sjerps M
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Jul; 136(4):1027-1036. PubMed ID: 34988615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bloodstain pattern analysis & Bayes: A case report.
Meijrink L; van der Scheer M; Kokshoorn B
Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):551-561. PubMed ID: 37453788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lead isotope ratios for bullets, forensic evaluation in a Bayesian paradigm.
Sjåstad KE; Lucy D; Andersen T
Talanta; 2016 Jan; 146():62-70. PubMed ID: 26695235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions.
Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 15270454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
Hicks T; Biedermann A; de Koeijer JA; Taroni F; Champod C; Evett IW
Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26654089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
