These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35741719)

  • 21. Interpretation of a paint cross-transfer on a burglary scene - A case report.
    Vanneste F; Lim-Hitchings YC; Massonnet G; Lunstroot K
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):258-263. PubMed ID: 38735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (a note for forensic scientists).
    Taroni F; Biedermann A; Vuille J; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Jul; 7(4):467-70. PubMed ID: 23623242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
    Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.
    Berger CE; Buckleton J; Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21605824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluative approach to semen transfer in a case of alleged sexual assault: A case study.
    Murphy C; Ryan J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jul; 62(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 35931450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook.
    Biedermann A; Hicks T; Voisard R; Taroni F; Champod C; Aitken CG; Evett IW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):2-7. PubMed ID: 23122648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling part I: a review of the legal literature.
    Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16216711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.
    Jackson G; Jones S; Booth G; Champod C; Evett IW
    Sci Justice; 2006; 46(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 16878783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice.
    Hughes V; Rhodes R
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 29895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: reports of DNA analysis.
    Howes LM; Julian R; Kelty SF; Kemp N; Kirkbride KP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():7-18. PubMed ID: 24530439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK--past, present, and future perspectives.
    Gill P
    Biotechniques; 2002 Feb; 32(2):366-8, 370, 372, passim. PubMed ID: 11848414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.