152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35743349)
1. Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Kamath V; Hebbal M; Ankola A; Sankeshwari R; Jalihal S; Choudhury A; Soliman M; Eldwakhly E
J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 35743349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Forss H; Walsh T; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 23543512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
Kashbour W; Gupta P; Worthington HV; Boyers D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 11(11):CD003067. PubMed ID: 33142363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Forss H; Walsh T; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD001830. PubMed ID: 28759120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].
Yan WJ; Zheng JJ; Chen XX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):911-914. PubMed ID: 30337757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant-A Clinical Trial.
Beresescu L; Pacurar M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Dako T; Petcu B; Eșian D
Children (Basel); 2022 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 35626822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An
Singh C; Kaur K; Kapoor K
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An
Mathew SR; Narayanan RK; Vadekkepurayil K; Puthiyapurayil J
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(6):553-559. PubMed ID: 32440074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Worthington H; Mäkelä M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 15266455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study.
Reddy VR; Chowdhary N; Mukunda KS; Kiran NK; Kavyarani BS; Pradeep MC
Contemp Clin Dent; 2015 Mar; 6(Suppl 1):S18-23. PubMed ID: 25821368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Alsabek L; Al-Nerabieah Z; Bshara N; Comisi JC
J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():69-74. PubMed ID: 31136817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Wear Strength and Compressive Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants with a Nanofilled Resin Coating: An
Gunasekaran R; Sharmin D; Baghkomeh PN; Jaganathan G; Ravindran V
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jan; 17(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 38559869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
Liu BY; Xiao Y; Chu CH; Lo EC
BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of fissure sealants on fully erupted permanent molars with incipient carious lesions: A glass-ionomer-based versus a resin-based sealant.
Jaafar N; Ragab H; Abedrahman A; Osman E
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2020; 14(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 32454960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
