These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35743372)

  • 41. Space Available for Cord, Motion, and disc degeneration at the adjacent segments level of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis using kinematic MRI.
    Paholpak P; Nazareth A; Barkoh K; Lee LV; Lucas J; Buser Z; Wang JC
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 45():89-99. PubMed ID: 28797605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Injection of human umbilical tissue-derived cells into the nucleus pulposus alters the course of intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo.
    Leckie SK; Sowa GA; Bechara BP; Hartman RA; Coelho JP; Witt WT; Dong QD; Bowman BW; Bell KM; Vo NV; Kramer BC; Kang JD
    Spine J; 2013 Mar; 13(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 23384411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Multivariate analysis for prognostic factors on non-operative treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation].
    Chen QM; Chen QX
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2016 Mar; 29(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 27149794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. T2 relaxation time for intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with upper back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI.
    Xie R; Ruan L; Chen L; Zhou K; Yuan J; Ji W; Jing G; Huang X; Shi Q; Chen C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Jan; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 28143419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Degeneration and height of cervical discs classified from MRI compared with precise height measurements from radiographs.
    Kolstad F; Myhr G; Kvistad KA; Nygaard OP; Leivseth G
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Sep; 55(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 16129250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine.
    Morishita Y; Hida S; Miyazaki M; Hong SW; Zou J; Wei F; Naito M; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):E178-82. PubMed ID: 18344847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Forward shifting of posterior dural sac during flexion cervical magnetic resonance imaging in Hirayama disease: an initial study on normal subjects compared to patients with Hirayama disease.
    Lai V; Wong YC; Poon WL; Yuen MK; Fu YP; Wong OW
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):724-8. PubMed ID: 20727701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How is spinal range of motion affected by disc- and facet degeneration and spinopelvic anatomy?
    Farshad M; Aichmair A; Götschi T; Senteler M; Urbanschitz L
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2021 Sep; 7():100076. PubMed ID: 35141641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Association between intervertebral disc degeneration and the Oswestry Disability Index.
    Middendorp M; Vogl TJ; Kollias K; Kafchitsas K; Khan MF; Maataoui A
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017; 30(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 28372314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers.
    Okada E; Matsumoto M; Ichihara D; Chiba K; Toyama Y; Fujiwara H; Momoshima S; Nishiwaki Y; Hashimoto T; Ogawa J; Watanabe M; Takahata T
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1644-51. PubMed ID: 19609784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic korean subjects. Part 3 : cervical and lumbar relationship.
    Kim SJ; Lee TH; Yi S
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2013 Mar; 53(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 23634267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.
    Edmondston SJ; Song S; Bricknell RV; Davies PA; Fersum K; Humphries P; Wickenden D; Singer KP
    Man Ther; 2000 Aug; 5(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 11034886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A population-based study identifies an association of THBS2 with intervertebral disc degeneration.
    Deguchi T; Hashizume H; Nakajima M; Teraguchi M; Akune T; Yamada H; Tanaka S; Yoshimura N; Nojima M; Yoshida M; Ikegawa S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1501-1507. PubMed ID: 31233787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Equine cervical intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with location and MRI features.
    Veraa S; Bergmann W; Wijnberg ID; Back W; Vernooij H; Nielen M; van den Belt AM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2019 Nov; 60(6):696-706. PubMed ID: 31353764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.
    Miyazaki M; Hong SW; Yoon SH; Morishita Y; Wang JC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 18525490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of Static Compression Loads on Intervertebral Disc: An in Vivo Bent Rat Tail Model.
    Xia W; Zhang LL; Mo J; Zhang W; Li HT; Luo ZP; Yang HL
    Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 29770581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Long-term effect of physical inactivity on thoracic and lumbar disc degeneration-an MRI-based analysis of 385 individuals from the general population.
    Maurer E; Klinger C; Lorbeer R; Rathmann W; Peters A; Schlett CL; Nikolaou K; Bamberg F; Notohamiprodjo M; Walter SS
    Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1386-1396. PubMed ID: 32360761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diffusion-weighted 7.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Rats.
    Li LY; Wu XL; Roman RJ; Fan F; Qiu CS; Chen BH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Jan; 131(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 29271382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine.
    Miyazaki M; Hong SW; Yoon SH; Zou J; Tow B; Alanay A; Abitbol JJ; Wang JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 18197105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology.
    Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.