These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 357442)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts.
    Cooper BH; Johnson JB; Thaxton ES
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Apr; 7(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 956362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of yeast identification systems. An analysis of the College of American Pathologists Special Mycology Survey data.
    Fuchs PC; Dolan CT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4 Suppl):664-7. PubMed ID: 7137107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 1102563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems.
    Salkin IF; Land GA; Hurd NJ; Goldson PR; McGinnis MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Apr; 25(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 3571470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.
    Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the RapID Yeast Plus System for the identification of yeast.
    Moghaddas J; Truant AL; Jordan C; Buckley HR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Dec; 35(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10668585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms.
    Graf B; Adam T; Zill E; Göbel UB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 May; 38(5):1782-5. PubMed ID: 10790099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
    Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the rapid yeast plus panel with the API20C yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of Candida species.
    Heelan JS; Sotomayor E; Coon K; D'Arezzo JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1443-5. PubMed ID: 9574727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.