175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35747784)
1. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader reliability of the MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2018) risk stratification and management system.
Singh R; Wilson MP; Manolea F; Ahmed B; Fung C; Receveur D; Low G
SA J Radiol; 2022; 26(1):2386. PubMed ID: 35747784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of ultrasound ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system amongst less experienced readers before and after training.
Katlariwala P; Wilson MP; Pi Y; Chahal BS; Croutze R; Patel D; Patel V; Low G
World J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 14(9):319-328. PubMed ID: 36186517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study.
Ludwig DR; Romberg EK; Fraum TJ; Rohe E; Fowler KJ; Khanna G
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 May; 49(6):746-758. PubMed ID: 31069473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-reader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS among radiologists with different levels of experience.
Li W; Li L; Zhuang BW; Ruan SM; Hu HT; Huang Y; Lin MX; Xie XY; Kuang M; Lu MD; Chen LD; Wang W
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6758-6767. PubMed ID: 33675388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?
Zhang N; Xu H; Ren AH; Zhang Q; Yang DW; Ba T; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 33963801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for categorising hepatic observations in patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Li S; Zhou L; Chen R; Chen Y; Niu Z; Qian L; Fang Y; Xu L; Xu H; Zhang L
Clin Radiol; 2021 Feb; 76(2):161.e1-161.e10. PubMed ID: 33198943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in improving the sensitivity of LI-RADS classification of small hepatic observations suspected of malignancy.
Basha MAA; Refaat R; Mohammad FF; Khamis MEM; El-Maghraby AM; El Sammak AA; Al-Molla RM; Mohamed HAE; Alnaggar AA; Hassan HA; Azmy TM; Alaa Eldin AM; Assy MM; AlAzzazy MZ; Altaher KM; Tantawy HF; Saber S; Amin MI; Alsowey AM; Radwan MHS; Taha HF; Fathy T; Hanafy AS; Abdelbary EH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 30603882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6856-6867. PubMed ID: 33713172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen J; Kuang S; Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Zhang L; Rong D; He B; Deng Y; Xiao Y; Shi W; Fowler K; Wang J; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1530-1542. PubMed ID: 33040166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Makkar J; Guniganti P; Cornman-Homonoff J; Lee MJ; Pittman M; Askin G; Hecht EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e205-e215. PubMed ID: 30257054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Focal Liver Lesions by Inexperienced Radiologists.
Wang JY; Feng SY; Xu JW; Li J; Chu L; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Aug; 39(8):1537-1546. PubMed ID: 32078173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chen N; Motosugi U; Morisaka H; Ichikawa S; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Matsuda M; Fujii H; Onishi H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 26104079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study.
Mulé S; Ronot M; Ghosn M; Sartoris R; Corrias G; Reizine E; Morard V; Quelever R; Dumont L; Hernandez Londono J; Coustaud N; Vilgrain V; Luciani A
JHEP Rep; 2023 Oct; 5(10):100857. PubMed ID: 37771548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.
Ludwig DR; Fraum TJ; Cannella R; Ballard DH; Tsai R; Naeem M; LeBlanc M; Salter A; Tsung A; Shetty AS; Borhani AA; Furlan A; Fowler KJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2116-2132. PubMed ID: 30798397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic efficacy of dynamic liver imaging using qualitative diagnostic algorithm versus LI-RADS v2018 lexicon for atypical versus classical HCC lesions: A decade of experience from a tertiary liver institute.
Laroia ST; Yadav K; Rastogi A; Kumar G; Kumar S; Sarin SK
Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100219. PubMed ID: 32083152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of extracellular contrast versus gadoxetic acid in assessing small liver lesions using liver imaging reporting and data system v.2018 and European association for the study of the liver criteria.
Rimola J; Sapena V; Brancatelli G; Darnell A; Forzenigo L; Mähringer-Kunz A; Paisant A; Renzulli M; Schima W; Terraz S; Valls C; Wagner M; Ayuso C; Vilgrain V; Reig M; Ronot M
Hepatology; 2022 Nov; 76(5):1318-1328. PubMed ID: 35349760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
