205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35748900)
1. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications.
Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence for Indication of Invasive Assessment of Calcifications in Mammography Screening.
Weigel S; Brehl AK; Heindel W; Kerschke L
Rofo; 2023 Jan; 195(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 36587613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance?
Choi WJ; Han K; Shin HJ; Lee J; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 32960330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depiction of breast cancers on digital mammograms by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis according to cancer characteristics.
Lee SE; Han K; Yoon JH; Youk JH; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7400-7408. PubMed ID: 35499564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS.
Park GE; Kim SH; Lee JM; Kang BJ; Chae BJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):710-715. PubMed ID: 31063419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies.
Kaltenbach B; Brandenbusch V; Möbus V; Mall G; Falk S; van den Bergh M; Chevalier F; Müller-Schimpfle M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():221-226. PubMed ID: 28027751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic calcifications undergoing percutaneous biopsy: outcome in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer.
Bertani V; Berger N; Eberhard M; Lång K; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Boss A; Frauenfelder T; Marcon M
Radiol Med; 2023 Feb; 128(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 36598734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications.
Cheng M; Tong W; Luo J; Li M; Liang J; Pan F; Pan J; Zheng Y; Xie X
Clin Radiol; 2020 Dec; 75(12):934-941. PubMed ID: 32814625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Mammographic, Radiologist, and Patient Factors on the Likelihood of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Assessment at Diagnostic Mammography.
Chesebro AL; Abbasi N; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Licaros ARL; Giess CS
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 38655858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging and Histopathologic Features of BI-RADS 3 Lesions Upgraded during Imaging Surveillance.
Michaels A; Chung CS; Birdwell RL; Frost EP; Giess CS
Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 27612001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
