These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35749735)

  • 1. Fracture prediction tools in diabetes.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2022 Aug; 29(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 35749735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
    Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
    El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in Individuals with Diabetes: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD; Nguyen TV; Morin SN; Lix LM; Eisman JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2022 Jun; 110(6):658-665. PubMed ID: 34994831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of Fracture Prediction Tools.
    Kanis JA; Harvey NC; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey EV; Leslie WD
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):444-450. PubMed ID: 28716500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DXA-Based Measurements in Diabetes: Can They Predict Fracture Risk?
    Schacter GI; Leslie WD
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2017 Feb; 100(2):150-164. PubMed ID: 27591864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Fracture Prediction Tools in Individuals Without and With Early Chronic Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of CARTaGENE.
    Desbiens LC; Sidibé A; Beaudoin C; Jean S; Mac-Way F
    J Bone Miner Res; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 32022942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AI algorithms for accurate prediction of osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes: an up-to-date review.
    Li Z; Zhao W; Lin X; Li F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):956. PubMed ID: 38087332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator: a registry-based cohort study.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD; Nguyen TV; Morin SN; Lix LM; Eisman JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Mar; 33(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 34839377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personalized fracture risk assessment: where are we at?
    Nguyen TV
    Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Jul; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 33982611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal fracture prediction thresholds for therapy onset, established from FRAX and Garvan algorithms: a longitudinal observation of the population representative female cohort from the RAC-OST-POL Study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Nov; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 37973685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.
    Todorov G; Brook S; Quah Qin Xian N; Von Widekind S; Freudenthal B; Comninos AN
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e060282. PubMed ID: 35820750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture risk and assessment in adults with cancer.
    Ye C; Leslie WD
    Osteoporos Int; 2023 Mar; 34(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 36512057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The utility of absolute risk prediction using FRAX® and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in daily practice.
    van Geel TA; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Center JR; Dinant GJ
    Maturitas; 2014 Feb; 77(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 24287178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture Risk Assessment: From Population to Individual.
    Nguyen TV; Eisman JA
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):368-378. PubMed ID: 28729045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased cortical porosity and reduced cortical thickness of the proximal femur are associated with nonvertebral fracture independent of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Garvan estimates in postmenopausal women.
    Kral R; Osima M; Borgen TT; Vestgaard R; Richardsen E; Bjørnerem Å
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185363. PubMed ID: 28945789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population.
    Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T
    Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.