These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35750103)

  • 21. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
    Kane EI; Gallo JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of the institutional review board in quality improvement: a survey of quality officers, institutional review board chairs, and journal editors.
    Lindenauer PK; Benjamin EM; Naglieri-Prescod D; Fitzgerald J; Pekow P
    Am J Med; 2002 Nov; 113(7):575-9. PubMed ID: 12459404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical considerations in planning and conducting research on human subjects.
    Sieber JE
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S9-13. PubMed ID: 8373498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.
    Klitzman RL
    Dev World Bioeth; 2012 Aug; 12(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 22515423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
    Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Working with the institutional review board.
    Byerly WG
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethical considerations for quality assurance versus scientific research.
    Koschnitzke L; McCracken SC; Pranulis MF
    West J Nurs Res; 1992 Jun; 14(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 1615652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
    Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
    Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Legally Effective but Ethically Inadequate: Institutional Review Board Policies for Consent from Legally Authorized Representatives.
    Harrison RR
    Ethics Hum Res; 2023 Mar; 45(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 36974454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computerized information management for institutional review boards.
    Hood MN; Gugerty B; Levine R; Ho VB
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2005; 23(4):190-8; quiz 199-200. PubMed ID: 16027533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.
    Adams P; Kaewkungwal J; Limphattharacharoen C; Prakobtham S; Pengsaa K; Khusmith S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113356. PubMed ID: 25406085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.
    Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS;
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29313771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Expanded Role for IRBs in the Oversight of Research Biopsies.
    Levit LA; Kaneshiro J; Peppercorn J; Ratain MJ
    Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Sep; 44(5):32-41. PubMed ID: 36047275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide.
    Ernst AA; Weiss SJ; Nick TG; Iserson K; Biros MH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1134-7. PubMed ID: 16264084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons.
    Kodish E; Stocking C; Ratain MJ; Kohrman A; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 1403062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Research and quality management studies: ethical considerations.
    Mayhew PA
    Medsurg Nurs; 1994 Apr; 3(2):149-50, 148. PubMed ID: 8173626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research.
    Kennedy BJ
    J Bioeth; 1984; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10271128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.