These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35750517)

  • 41. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.
    Wang C; Swerdloff RS
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1502-7. PubMed ID: 25458617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination.
    Ruiter-Ligeti J; Agbo C; Dahan M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):218-224. PubMed ID: 27990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Are proton-pump inhibitors harmful for the semen quality of men in couples who are planning pregnancy?
    Huijgen NA; de Ridder MA; Verhamme KM; Dohle GR; Vanrolleghem AM; Sturkenboom MC; Laven JS; Steegers-Theunissen RP
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1666-1672.e2. PubMed ID: 27743698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clarifying the relationship between total motile sperm counts and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates.
    Muthigi A; Jahandideh S; Bishop LA; Naeemi FK; Shipley SK; O'Brien JE; Shin PR; Devine K; Tanrikut C
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 33610321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of a large cohort of men presenting for a screening semen analysis.
    Acacio BD; Gottfried T; Israel R; Sokol RZ
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Mar; 73(3):595-7. PubMed ID: 10689019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Age thresholds for changes in semen parameters in men.
    Stone BA; Alex A; Werlin LB; Marrs RP
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):952-8. PubMed ID: 23809502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subfertility increases risk of testicular cancer: evidence from population-based semen samples.
    Hanson HA; Anderson RE; Aston KI; Carrell DT; Smith KR; Hotaling JM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):322-8.e1. PubMed ID: 26604070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm.
    Dickey RP; Pyrzak R; Lu PY; Taylor SN; Rye PH
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Apr; 71(4):684-9. PubMed ID: 10202879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic value of routine semen analysis in clinical andrology.
    Baskaran S; Finelli R; Agarwal A; Henkel R
    Andrologia; 2021 Mar; 53(2):e13614. PubMed ID: 32400107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison between semen parameters in specimens collected early in the morning and in the evening.
    Shimomura Y; Shin T; Osaka A; Inoue Y; Iwahata T; Kobori Y; Ide H; Soh S; Okada H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Apr; 66(2):147-150. PubMed ID: 32195611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impaired semen quality in trans women: prevalence and determinants.
    de Nie I; Meißner A; Kostelijk EH; Soufan AT; Voorn-de Warem IAC; den Heijer M; Huirne J; van Mello NM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1529-1536. PubMed ID: 32613241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Racial Variation in Semen Quality at Fertility Evaluation.
    Khandwala YS; Zhang CA; Li S; Behr B; Guo D; Eisenberg ML
    Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():96-102. PubMed ID: 28522219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Seasonal variation in semen quality is not associated with fecundity in the Utah Population Database.
    Patel DP; Cheng PJ; Hanson HA; Smith KR; Aston KI; Pastuszak AW; Hotaling JM
    Andrologia; 2022 Oct; 54(9):e14515. PubMed ID: 35768958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Infertility as a proxy of general male health: results of a cross-sectional survey.
    Ventimiglia E; Capogrosso P; Boeri L; Serino A; Colicchia M; Ippolito S; Scano R; Papaleo E; Damiano R; Montorsi F; Salonia A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 26006735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genitourinary cancer patients have worse baseline semen parameters than healthy sperm bankers.
    Xu R; Centola GM; Tanrikut C
    Andrology; 2019 Jul; 7(4):449-453. PubMed ID: 30786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does methylphenidate use affect sperm parameters in patients undergoing infertility investigation? A retrospective analysis of 9769 semen samples.
    Shalev H; Mizrakli Y; Zeadna A; Harlev A; Levitas E; Ifergane G; Lunenfeld E; Novack V; Har-Vardi I; Levitas E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):539-546. PubMed ID: 33433701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Geographical differences in semen characteristics: Comparing semen parameters of infertile men of the United States and Iraq.
    Palani A; Sengupta P; Agarwal A; Henkel R
    Andrologia; 2020 Apr; 52(3):e13519. PubMed ID: 32003032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.
    Paffoni A; Somigliana E; Boeri L; Viganò P
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 35849333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Semen quality pattern and age threshold: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 71,623 infertile men in China, between 2011 and 2017.
    Li WN; Jia MM; Peng YQ; Ding R; Fan LQ; Liu G
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Dec; 17(1):107. PubMed ID: 31815629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.