135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35751808)
1. Accurate Ensemble Prediction of Somatic Mutations with SMuRF2.
Huang W; Sim NL; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():53-66. PubMed ID: 35751808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensemble-Based Somatic Mutation Calling in Cancer Genomes.
Huang W; Guo YA; Chang MM; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():37-46. PubMed ID: 32124310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SMuRF: portable and accurate ensemble prediction of somatic mutations.
Huang W; Guo YA; Muthukumar K; Baruah P; Chang MM; Jacobsen Skanderup A
Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(17):3157-3159. PubMed ID: 30649191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NeoMutate: an ensemble machine learning framework for the prediction of somatic mutations in cancer.
Anzar I; Sverchkova A; Stratford R; Clancy T
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 May; 12(1):63. PubMed ID: 31096972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SomaticSeq: An Ensemble and Machine Learning Method to Detect Somatic Mutations.
Fang LT
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():47-70. PubMed ID: 32124311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construction of a combinatorial pipeline using two somatic variant calling methods for whole exome sequence data of gastric cancer.
Kohmoto T; Masuda K; Naruto T; Tange S; Shoda K; Hamada J; Saito M; Ichikawa D; Tajima A; Otsuji E; Imoto I
J Med Invest; 2017; 64(3.4):233-240. PubMed ID: 28954988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indel detection from RNA-seq data: tool evaluation and strategies for accurate detection of actionable mutations.
Sun Z; Bhagwate A; Prodduturi N; Yang P; Kocher JA
Brief Bioinform; 2017 Nov; 18(6):973-983. PubMed ID: 27473065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour-normal paired sequencing data.
Ding J; Bashashati A; Roth A; Oloumi A; Tse K; Zeng T; Haffari G; Hirst M; Marra MA; Condon A; Aparicio S; Shah SP
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 22084253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Individualized Approach for Somatic Variant Discovery.
Li M; He T; Cao C; Long Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():11-36. PubMed ID: 32124309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ISOWN: accurate somatic mutation identification in the absence of normal tissue controls.
Kalatskaya I; Trinh QM; Spears M; McPherson JD; Bartlett JMS; Stein L
Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):59. PubMed ID: 28659176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel machine learning approach (svmSomatic) to distinguish somatic and germline mutations using next-generation sequencing data.
Mao YF; Yuan XG; Cun YP
Zool Res; 2021 Mar; 42(2):246-249. PubMed ID: 33709636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of RNA- and exome sequencing: Increasing specificity for identification of somatic point mutations and indels in acute leukaemia.
Hansen MC; Herborg LL; Hansen M; Roug AS; Hokland P
Leuk Res; 2016 Dec; 51():27-31. PubMed ID: 27821287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scalable Open Science Approach for Mutation Calling of Tumor Exomes Using Multiple Genomic Pipelines.
Ellrott K; Bailey MH; Saksena G; Covington KR; Kandoth C; Stewart C; Hess J; Ma S; Chiotti KE; McLellan M; Sofia HJ; Hutter C; Getz G; Wheeler D; Ding L; ;
Cell Syst; 2018 Mar; 6(3):271-281.e7. PubMed ID: 29596782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of oncogenic and clinically actionable mutations in cancer genomes critically depends on variant calling tools.
Garcia-Prieto CA; Martínez-Jiménez F; Valencia A; Porta-Pardo E
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(12):3181-3191. PubMed ID: 35512388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PipeIT2: A tumor-only somatic variant calling workflow for molecular diagnostic Ion Torrent sequencing data.
Schnidrig D; Garofoli A; Benjak A; Rätsch G; Rubin MA; ; Piscuoglio S; Ng CKY
Genomics; 2023 Mar; 115(2):110587. PubMed ID: 36796655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
