These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35752015)

  • 1. Sticky me: Self-relevance slows reinforcement learning.
    Golubickis M; Macrae CN
    Cognition; 2022 Oct; 227():105207. PubMed ID: 35752015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning about me and you: Only deterministic stimulus associations elicit self-prioritization.
    Jalalian P; Golubickis M; Sharma Y; Neil Macrae C
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Nov; 116():103602. PubMed ID: 37952404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brief mindfulness-based meditation enhances the speed of learning following positive prediction errors.
    Golubickis M; Tan LBG; Jalalian P; Falbén JK; Macrae NC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Nov; 77(11):2312-2324. PubMed ID: 38229479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus valence moderates self-learning.
    Jalalian P; Svensson S; Golubickis M; Sharma Y; Macrae CN
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Sep; 38(6):884-897. PubMed ID: 38576360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of the unexpected: Prediction errors enhance stereotype-based learning.
    Falbén JK; Golubickis M; Tsamadi D; Persson LM; Macrae CN
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105386. PubMed ID: 36773491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty.
    Wu CM; Schulz E; Pleskac TJ; Speekenbrink M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4122. PubMed ID: 35260717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward prediction errors, not sensory prediction errors, play a major role in model selection in human reinforcement learning.
    Wu Y; Morita M; Izawa J
    Neural Netw; 2022 Oct; 154():109-121. PubMed ID: 35872516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time elapsed between choices in a probabilistic task correlates with repeating the same decision.
    Jabłońska J; Szumiec Ł; Zieliński P; Rodriguez Parkitna J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2639-2654. PubMed ID: 33559232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value-Based Choice, Contingency Learning, and Suicidal Behavior in Mid- and Late-Life Depression.
    Dombrovski AY; Hallquist MN; Brown VM; Wilson J; Szanto K
    Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Mar; 85(6):506-516. PubMed ID: 30502081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are methamphetamine users compulsive? Faulty reinforcement learning, not inflexibility, underlies decision making in people with methamphetamine use disorder.
    Robinson AH; Perales JC; Volpe I; Chong TT; Verdejo-Garcia A
    Addict Biol; 2021 Jul; 26(4):e12999. PubMed ID: 33393187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.
    Svensson SL; Golubickis M; Maclean H; Falbén JK; Persson LM; Tsamadi D; Caughey S; Sahraie A; Macrae CN
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1145-1164. PubMed ID: 34324041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaired Expected Value Computations Coupled With Overreliance on Stimulus-Response Learning in Schizophrenia.
    Hernaus D; Gold JM; Waltz JA; Frank MJ
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2018 Nov; 3(11):916-926. PubMed ID: 29735404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Offline replay supports planning in human reinforcement learning.
    Momennejad I; Otto AR; Daw ND; Norman KA
    Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30547886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty of treatment efficacy moderates placebo effects on reinforcement learning.
    Augustat N; Endres D; Mueller EM
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14421. PubMed ID: 38909105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in learning from exploration.
    Chen CS; Knep E; Han A; Ebitz RB; Grissom NM
    Elife; 2021 Nov; 10():. PubMed ID: 34796870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the influence of working memory, reinforcement, and action uncertainty on reaction time and choice during instrumental learning.
    McDougle SD; Collins AGE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):20-39. PubMed ID: 32710256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Credit Assignment in a Motor Decision Making Task Is Influenced by Agency and Not Sensory Prediction Errors.
    Parvin DE; McDougle SD; Taylor JA; Ivry RB
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(19):4521-4530. PubMed ID: 29650698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation.
    Cavanagh JF; Figueroa CM; Cohen MX; Frank MJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Nov; 22(11):2575-86. PubMed ID: 22120491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.
    Stojić H; Orquin JL; Dayan P; Dolan RJ; Speekenbrink M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Feb; 117(6):3291-3300. PubMed ID: 31980535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.