225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35752289)
1. GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes After Gene Editing Through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing.
Quan ZJ; Li SA; Yang ZX; Zhao JJ; Li GH; Zhang F; Wen W; Cheng T; Zhang XB
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 21(6):1221-1236. PubMed ID: 35752289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective control of large deletions after double-strand breaks by homology-directed repair and dsODN insertion.
Wen W; Quan ZJ; Li SA; Yang ZX; Fu YW; Zhang F; Li GH; Zhao M; Yin MD; Xu J; Zhang JP; Cheng T; Zhang XB
Genome Biol; 2021 Aug; 22(1):236. PubMed ID: 34416913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
Guo T; Feng YL; Xiao JJ; Liu Q; Sun XN; Xiang JF; Kong N; Liu SC; Chen GQ; Wang Y; Dong MM; Cai Z; Lin H; Cai XJ; Xie AY
Genome Biol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 30340517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods Favoring Homology-Directed Repair Choice in Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Induced-Double Strand Breaks.
Yang H; Ren S; Yu S; Pan H; Li T; Ge S; Zhang J; Xia N
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32899704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superior Fidelity and Distinct Editing Outcomes of SaCas9 Compared with SpCas9 in Genome Editing.
Yang ZX; Fu YW; Zhao JJ; Zhang F; Li SA; Zhao M; Wen W; Zhang L; Cheng T; Zhang JP; Zhang XB
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 21(6):1206-1220. PubMed ID: 36549468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decoding the complexity of on-target integration: characterizing DNA insertions at the CRISPR-Cas9 targeted locus using nanopore sequencing.
Zhao JJ; Sun XY; Tian SN; Zhao ZZ; Yin MD; Zhao M; Zhang F; Li SA; Yang ZX; Wen W; Cheng T; Gong A; Zhang JP; Zhang XB
BMC Genomics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):189. PubMed ID: 38368357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple and practical workflow for genotyping of CRISPR-Cas9-based knockout phenotypes using multiplexed amplicon sequencing.
Iida M; Suzuki M; Sakane Y; Nishide H; Uchiyama I; Yamamoto T; Suzuki KT; Fujii S
Genes Cells; 2020 Jul; 25(7):498-509. PubMed ID: 32323394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Highly efficient CRISPR/HDR-mediated knock-in for mouse embryonic stem cells and zygotes.
Wang B; Li K; Wang A; Reiser M; Saunders T; Lockey RF; Wang JW
Biotechniques; 2015 Oct; 59(4):201-2, 204, 206-8. PubMed ID: 26458548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A high-efficiency and versatile CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR-based biallelic editing system.
Li X; Sun B; Qian H; Ma J; Paolino M; Zhang Z
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2022 Feb; 23(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 35187887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish.
Albadri S; Del Bene F; Revenu C
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():77-85. PubMed ID: 28300641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. TEG-seq: an ion torrent-adapted NGS workflow for in cellulo mapping of CRISPR specificity.
Tang PZ; Ding B; Peng L; Mozhayskiy V; Potter J; Chesnut JD
Biotechniques; 2018 Nov; 65(5):259-267. PubMed ID: 30114933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate analysis of genuine CRISPR editing events with ampliCan.
Labun K; Guo X; Chavez A; Church G; Gagnon JA; Valen E
Genome Res; 2019 May; 29(5):843-847. PubMed ID: 30850374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Modifications in Zebrafish.
Kamachi Y; Kawahara A
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():313-324. PubMed ID: 36773157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combi-CRISPR: combination of NHEJ and HDR provides efficient and precise plasmid-based knock-ins in mice and rats.
Yoshimi K; Oka Y; Miyasaka Y; Kotani Y; Yasumura M; Uno Y; Hattori K; Tanigawa A; Sato M; Oya M; Nakamura K; Matsushita N; Kobayashi K; Mashimo T
Hum Genet; 2021 Feb; 140(2):277-287. PubMed ID: 32617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of genome edited cells using CRISPRnano.
Nguyen T; Ramachandran H; Martins S; Krutmann J; Rossi A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jul; 50(W1):W199-W203. PubMed ID: 35640601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulating mutational outcomes and improving precise gene editing at CRISPR-Cas9-induced breaks by chemical inhibition of end-joining pathways.
Schimmel J; Muñoz-Subirana N; Kool H; van Schendel R; van der Vlies S; Kamp JA; de Vrij FMS; Kushner SA; Smith GCM; Boulton SJ; Tijsterman M
Cell Rep; 2023 Feb; 42(2):112019. PubMed ID: 36701230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NHEJ-Mediated Repair of CRISPR-Cas9-Induced DNA Breaks Efficiently Corrects Mutations in HSPCs from Patients with Fanconi Anemia.
Román-Rodríguez FJ; Ugalde L; Álvarez L; Díez B; Ramírez MJ; Risueño C; Cortón M; Bogliolo M; Bernal S; March F; Ayuso C; Hanenberg H; Sevilla J; Rodríguez-Perales S; Torres-Ruiz R; Surrallés J; Bueren JA; Río P
Cell Stem Cell; 2019 Nov; 25(5):607-621.e7. PubMed ID: 31543367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection and Quantification of HDR and NHEJ Induced by Genome Editing at Endogenous Gene Loci Using Droplet Digital PCR.
Miyaoka Y; Mayerl SJ; Chan AH; Conklin BR
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1768():349-362. PubMed ID: 29717453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
Salsman J; Dellaire G
Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CRISPR-Cas9-Edited Site Sequencing (CRES-Seq): An Efficient and High-Throughput Method for the Selection of CRISPR-Cas9-Edited Clones.
Veeranagouda Y; Debono-Lagneaux D; Fournet H; Thill G; Didier M
Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2018 Jan; 121():31.14.1-31.14.11. PubMed ID: 29337372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
