135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35752941)
1. Effect of Vent Hole and Cement Type on Fracture Resistance of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
Talay Çevlik E; Alkan Demetoğlu G; Yıldız P
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 35752941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
Bulut AC; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of implant-supported monolithic crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
Şalvarlı KC; Talay Çevlik E
Int J Esthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 18(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 36734424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
Wasiluk G; Chomik E; Gehrke P; Pietruska M; Skurska A; Pietruski J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses.
Sagsoz NP; Yanıkoglu N
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 21(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 29607851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of luting agents and stiffness of implant-abutments on marginal adaptation, chipping, and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns.
Schäfer L; Winkler C; Brandl G; Eckl S; Preis V; Behr M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():279-91. PubMed ID: 25168974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of screw access hole design on the fracture resistance of implant-supported zirconia-based restorations.
Saboury A; Mahshid M; Tabatabaian F; Moghadam L
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Nov; 30(6):545-550. PubMed ID: 30394670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments.
Lopes ACO; Machado CM; Bonjardim LR; Bergamo ETP; Ramalho IS; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e552-e556. PubMed ID: 29961986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of occlusal groove on abutment, crown thickness, and cement-type on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.
Tsuyuki Y; Sato T; Nomoto S; Yotsuya M; Koshihara T; Takemoto S; Yoshinari M
Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):843-850. PubMed ID: 29962415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
