These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35752941)

  • 21. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
    Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
    Sellers K; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the residual cement on custom computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconia abutments: A preliminary cohort study.
    Hsu KW; Liang CH; Peng YC; Hsiao CC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 34521506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.
    Yavuz A; Büyükerkmen EB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 37083917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
    Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
    Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Cement Type on Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Monolith vs Bilayered Zirconia Single Crowns.
    Reslan MR; Sayed M; Rayyan MM; Farouk H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Aug; 24(8):576-581. PubMed ID: 38193181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
    Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should the vent hole of posterior implant crowns be placed on the lateral surface? An in vitro study of the hydrodynamic feature of cement extrusion and retention ability.
    Ye S; Zhou H; Lyu X; Feng H; Liu M; Wen C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276198. PubMed ID: 36264869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture load of zirconia crowns based on preparation and cement type.
    Jenista JS; Hoopes WL; Knowles JF; Vandewalle KS
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(5):22-27. PubMed ID: 35993929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.