192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35753595)
1. Instant tissue field and magnetic susceptibility mapping from MRI raw phase using Laplacian enhanced deep neural networks.
Gao Y; Xiong Z; Fazlollahi A; Nestor PJ; Vegh V; Nasrallah F; Winter C; Pike GB; Crozier S; Liu F; Sun H
Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 259():119410. PubMed ID: 35753595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plug-and-Play latent feature editing for orientation-adaptive quantitative susceptibility mapping neural networks.
Gao Y; Xiong Z; Shan S; Liu Y; Rong P; Li M; Wilman AH; Pike GB; Liu F; Sun H
Med Image Anal; 2024 May; 94():103160. PubMed ID: 38552528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accelerating quantitative susceptibility and R2* mapping using incoherent undersampling and deep neural network reconstruction.
Gao Y; Cloos M; Liu F; Crozier S; Pike GB; Sun H
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118404. PubMed ID: 34280526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T: An evaluation in healthy subjects and patients with Huntington's disease.
Yao J; Morrison MA; Jakary A; Avadiappan S; Chen Y; Luitjens J; Glueck J; Driscoll T; Geschwind MD; Nelson AB; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Hess CP; Lupo JM
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119788. PubMed ID: 36476567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards in vivo ground truth susceptibility for single-orientation deep learning QSM: A multi-orientation gradient-echo MRI dataset.
Shi Y; Feng R; Li Z; Zhuang J; Zhang Y; Wei H
Neuroimage; 2022 Nov; 261():119522. PubMed ID: 35905811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep learning: Current status, challenges and opportunities.
Jung W; Bollmann S; Lee J
NMR Biomed; 2022 Apr; 35(4):e4292. PubMed ID: 32207195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Affine transformation edited and refined deep neural network for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Xiong Z; Gao Y; Liu F; Sun H
Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119842. PubMed ID: 36586542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MoDL-QSM: Model-based deep learning for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Feng R; Zhao J; Wang H; Yang B; Feng J; Shi Y; Zhang M; Liu C; Zhang Y; Zhuang J; Wei H
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118376. PubMed ID: 34246768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning-based single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction without brain extraction.
Wei H; Cao S; Zhang Y; Guan X; Yan F; Yeom KW; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116064. PubMed ID: 31377323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BFRnet: A deep learning-based MR background field removal method for QSM of the brain containing significant pathological susceptibility sources.
Zhu X; Gao Y; Liu F; Crozier S; Sun H
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):578-590. PubMed ID: 36064695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods on evaluating radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds and basal ganglia at 3T and 7T.
Chen Y; Genc O; Poynton CB; Banerjee S; Hess CP; Lupo JM
NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4666. PubMed ID: 35075701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning.
Zhu X; Gao Y; Liu F; Crozier S; Sun H
Z Med Phys; 2022 May; 32(2):188-198. PubMed ID: 34312047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning-based quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the presence of fat using synthetically generated multi-echo phase training data.
Hanspach J; Bollmann S; Grigo J; Karius A; Uder M; Laun FB
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1548-1560. PubMed ID: 35713187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsupervised resolution-agnostic quantitative susceptibility mapping using adaptive instance normalization.
Oh G; Bae H; Ahn HS; Park SH; Moon WJ; Ye JC
Med Image Anal; 2022 Jul; 79():102477. PubMed ID: 35605505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the accuracy and precision of TE-dependent versus multi-echo QSM using Laplacian-based methods at 3 T.
Biondetti E; Karsa A; Thomas DL; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 32491224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
