These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754297)

  • 1. E-synthesis for carcinogenicity assessments: A case study of processed meat.
    De Pretis F; Jukola S; Landes J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2022 Oct; 28(5):752-772. PubMed ID: 35754297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence methods for a Bayesian epistemology-powered evidence evaluation.
    De Pretis F; Landes J; Peden W
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2021 Jun; 27(3):504-512. PubMed ID: 33569874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Red and processed meat intakes and cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: An umbrella systematic review and assessment of causal relations using Bradford Hill's criteria.
    Hill ER; O'Connor LE; Wang Y; Clark CM; McGowan BS; Forman MR; Campbell WW
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2024; 64(9):2423-2440. PubMed ID: 36154543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A weight of evidence approach to causal inference.
    Swaen G; van Amelsvoort L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 18834711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative weight of evidence assessment of Hill's guidelines for causal inference for cosmetic talc as a cause of mesothelioma.
    Ierardi AM; Urban A; Marsh GM
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2021 Apr; 417():115461. PubMed ID: 33617892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A supervised adverse drug reaction signalling framework imitating Bradford Hill's causality considerations.
    Reps JM; Garibaldi JM; Aickelin U; Gibson JE; Hubbard RB
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():356-68. PubMed ID: 26116429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analogy in causal inference: rethinking Austin Bradford Hill's neglected consideration.
    Weed DL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 May; 28(5):343-346. PubMed ID: 29609873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Leveraging Machine Learning to Facilitate Individual Case Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reactions.
    Cherkas Y; Ide J; van Stekelenborg J
    Drug Saf; 2022 May; 45(5):571-582. PubMed ID: 35579819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. E-Synthesis: A Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment in Pharmacosurveillance.
    De Pretis F; Landes J; Osimani B
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():1317. PubMed ID: 31920632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Game meat consumption by hunters and their relatives: a probabilistic approach.
    Sevillano Morales J; Moreno-Ortega A; Amaro Lopez MA; Arenas Casas A; Cámara-Martos F; Moreno-Rojas R
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1739-1748. PubMed ID: 29912678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists.
    Comfort S; Dorrell D; Meireis S; Fine J
    Drug Saf; 2018 Nov; 41(11):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 29876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat: What about environmental contaminants?
    Domingo JL; Nadal M
    Environ Res; 2016 Feb; 145():109-115. PubMed ID: 26656511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.
    Agbabiaka TB; Savović J; Ernst E
    Drug Saf; 2008; 31(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 18095744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red meat and processed meat: A review of scientific news since the IARC decision.
    Domingo JL; Nadal M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 105():256-261. PubMed ID: 28450127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [FROM STATISTICAL ASSOCIATIONS TO SCIENTIFIC CAUSALITY].
    Golan D; Linn S
    Harefuah; 2015 Jun; 154(6):389-93, 403. PubMed ID: 26281085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing the Mechanistic Evidence Assessors E-Synthesis and EBM+: A Case Study of Amoxicillin and Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS).
    Abdin AY; Auker-Howlett D; Landes J; Mulla G; Jacob C; Osimani B
    Curr Pharm Des; 2019; 25(16):1866-1880. PubMed ID: 31264541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal Criteria in Medical and Biological Disciplines: History, Essence, and Radiation Aspects. Report 4, Part 1: The Post-Hill Criteria and Ecolgoical Criteria.
    Koterov AN; Ushenkova LN
    Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci; 2022; 49(12):2423-2466. PubMed ID: 36845199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction reports using an expert-defined Bayesian network.
    Rodrigues PP; Ferreira-Santos D; Silva A; Polónia J; Ribeiro-Vaz I
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Sep; 91():12-22. PubMed ID: 30077492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causal assessment of pharmaceutical treatments: why standards of evidence should not be the same for benefits and harms?
    Osimani B; Mignini F
    Drug Saf; 2015 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25519721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.
    Murphy P; Glynn D; Dias S; Hodgson R; Claxton L; Beresford L; Cooper K; Tappenden P; Ennis K; Grosso A; Wright K; Cantrell A; Stevenson M; Palmer S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Dec; 25(76):1-228. PubMed ID: 34990339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.