These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754620)

  • 1. Detecting Differential Rater Functioning in Severity and Centrality: The Dual DRF Facets Model.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):757-781. PubMed ID: 35754620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rater Model Using Signal Detection Theory for Latent Differential Rater Functioning.
    Soo Park Y; Xing K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(4):492-504. PubMed ID: 30557061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Differential Rater Functioning in Latent Classes with New Mixture Facets Models.
    Jin KY; Wang WC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 28328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting Rater Biases in Sparse Rater-Mediated Assessment Networks.
    Wind SA; Ge Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):996-1022. PubMed ID: 34565815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the Combined Effects of Rater Misfit and Differential Rater Functioning in Performance Assessments.
    Wind SA; Guo W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):962-987. PubMed ID: 31488921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human ratings take time: A hierarchical facets model for the joint analysis of ratings and rating times.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3535-3547. PubMed ID: 37919615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating rater-student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation.
    Arifiyanti F; Soeharto S; Amukune S; Van Nguyen S; Aburezeq K; Hidayatullah A; Sarimanah E
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16548. PubMed ID: 37274636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Repeated Ratings to Improve Measurement Precision in Incomplete Rating Designs.
    Jones E; Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(2):148-161. PubMed ID: 29894984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining Rater Judgements in Music Performance Assessment using Many-Facets Rasch Rating Scale Measurement Model.
    Ooi PS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 30789834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rater characteristics, response content, and scoring contexts: Decomposing the determinates of scoring accuracy.
    Palermo C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():937097. PubMed ID: 36033049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the Impersonal Judgments and Personal Preferences of Raters in Rater-Mediated Assessments With Unfolding Models.
    Wang J; Engelhard G
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):773-795. PubMed ID: 32655183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Impacts of Rater Effects in Performance Assessments.
    Wind SA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):159-171. PubMed ID: 30792562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Rating Order Effects Under Item Response Theory Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments.
    Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 47(4):312-327. PubMed ID: 37283589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of exposure assessors' ratings of exposure intensity by type of occupational questionnaire and type of rater.
    Friesen MC; Coble JB; Katki HA; Ji BT; Xue S; Lu W; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 21511891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach.
    Qiu XL; Chiu MM; Wang WC; Chen PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1854-1868. PubMed ID: 34725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting Rater Effects under Rating Designs with Varying Levels of Missingness.
    Stafford RE; Wolfe EW; Casablanca JM; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):243-257. PubMed ID: 30169333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.